Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics related to prior and retreatment anti-EGFR regimens

From: Retreatment with anti-EGFR based therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: impact of intervening time interval and prior anti-EGFR response

Characteristic

N/total # pts (%)

Response on prior anti-EGFR therapy

  Response or stable disease ≥6 m

37/89 (42)

  No response or stable disease <6 m

52/89 (58)

Clinical benefit on anti-EGFR retreatment

 

  Best response CR/PR/SD

50/86 (58)

  Best response PD

36/86 (42)

Prior anti-EGFR-based regimens

 

  Panitumumab monotherapy

6/89 (7)

  Panitumumab + Chemotherapya

9/89 (10)

  Panitumumab and AMG-102/AMG-479

1/89 (1)

  Cetuximab monotherapy

2/89 (2)

  Cetuximab + Chemotherapyb

71/89 (80)

Anti-EGFR-based retreatment regimens

 

  Cetuximab, FOLFOX, and dasatinib

31/89 (35)

  Cetuximab, irinotecan, and bevacizumab

12/89 (13)

  Cetuximab and erlotinib

13/89 (15)

  Cetuximab and sirolimus

11/89 (12)

  Cetuximab, HAIc oxaliplatin, 5-FU, bevacizumab

20/89 (23)

  Cetuximab, HAI oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab

2/89 (2)

Interval length between prior and retreatment anti-EGFR therapies

Months

  Median

4.57

  Mean ± Standard Deviation

7.34 ± 8.9

  Range

0.46 – 58.7

  1. aChemotherapy regimen: irinotecan (7), FOLFIRI (1), 5-FU and irinotecan (1)
  2. bChemotherapy regimen: Irinotecan (42), FOLFIRI (15), FOLFOX (5), irinotecan and arq197 (3), irinotecan and apomab (1), irinotecan and bevacizumab (3), FOLFOX and dasatinib (1), Xelox (1)
  3. cHAI = Hepatic Arterial Infusion