Skip to main content

Table 2 Patients who filled the questionnaires: younger vs. older patients

From: Health related quality of life after oesophagectomy: elderly patients refer similar eating and swallowing difficulties than younger patients

 

Age < 70

Age > =70

p-value

N

86

23

-

Gender Male: Female

73:13

19:4

0.75

Age (years)a

58 (51–64)

75 (72–80)

<0.0001

Histotype:b

  

0.14

 Adenocarcinoma

62 (72.9)

13 (56.5)

 

 Squamous cell carcinoma

23 (27.1)

10 (43.5)

 

Tumour site:

  

0.42

 Cervical oesophagus

6 (7.0)

0

 

 Thoracic oesophagus

10 (11.6)

4 (17.4)

 

 Oesophago-gastric junction

70 (81.4)

19 (82.6)

 

Prognostic nutritional indexa

49.0 (46.5–52.0)

48.2 (44.4–50.7)

0.39

Charlson Comorbidity Indexa

2 (2–3)

3 (2–3)

0.09

Age related Charlson Comorbidity Indexac

3 (2–4)

5 (5–6)

<0.0001

Neoadjuvant therapy

75 (87.2)

15 (65.2)

0.03

Type of neoadjuvant therapy:

  

-

 Chemotherapy

24 (32.0)

5 (33.3)

 

 Radiotherapy

1 (1.3)

0

 

 Chemo-radiotherapy

50 (66.7)

10 (66.7)

 

Hospital stay (days)a

19 (16–24)

23 (18–30)

0.04

Pathological staged

  

0.07

 0

23 (26.7)

2 (8.7)

 

 I

16 (18.6)

4 (13.0)

 

 II

14 (16.3)

10 (43.5)

 

 III

29 (33.7)

7 (30.4)

 

 IV

4 (4.7)

1 (4.4)

 

Post-operative morbidity

20 (23.3)

9 (39.1)

0.18

  1. Data expressed as n (%) or amedian (IQR)
  2. bOther histotype in one patient
  3. cComparison biased due to age penalization in score calculation
  4. dPathological stage is ypstage for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and pstage for patients who did not