The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intention

BMC Cancer

Table 5 Regression coefficients, standard errors and model summary information for the parallel multiple mediator model depicted in Figure 1

	B^a	SE	t^b	p-value
Direct effect of Group on each belief
Perceived vulnerability	.135	.062	2.19	.029
Self- efficacy	.047	.033	1.44	.150
Response efficacy	.095	.040	2.38	.017
Peace of mind	.107	.036	2.97	.003
Disgust	-.093	.044	-2.13	.034
Symptom absence	-.047	.041	-1.14	.254
Direct effect of each belief on Intention^c
Perceived vulnerability	.058	.014	4.04	.000
Self- efficacy	.215	.030	7.24	.000
Response efficacy	.051	.024	2.13	.033
Peace of mind	.154	.028	5.44	.000
Disgust	-.060	.021	-2.93	.004
Symptom absence	-.127	.022	-5.67	.000
Total effect of Group on Intention
Group	.067	.032	2.08	.038
Direct effect of Group on Intention^d
Group	.016	.028	.578	.564

^aUnstandardised coefficient, ^bdf = 1095; ^cHolding all other beliefs and Group constant; ^dHolding beliefs about screening constant.

ISSN: 1471-2407