Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - John Luk |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Li Zhou |
26 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Greten |
3 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Spangenberg |
27 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andreas Stang |
31 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John Luk |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Spangenberg |
12 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andreas Stang |
24 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Li Zhou |
1 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Greten |
25 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John Luk |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John Luk |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
28 Oct 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John Luk |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
3 Nov 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Nov 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-389 |
You can find further information about peer review here.