Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary of percentage of cumulative volume of all nine standardized re-resection margins as compared to the BCS specimen volume, percentage of cumulative 2-dimensional surface area of all nine standardized re-resection margins as compared to the surface area of the BCS specimen, and percentage of cumulative 2-dimensional surface area of all nine standardized re-resection margins as compared to the surface area of the BCS specimen minus the surface area of the overlying skin ellipse from the pathology report of the 204 BCS cases

From: Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer

Variables

Percentage (range)

Percentage of cumulative volume of all nine standardized re-resection margins as compared to the BCS specimen volume

26.8% (3.5% – 85.7%)

Percentage of cumulative 2-dimensional surface area of all nine standardized re-resection margins as compared to the surface area of the BCS specimen

32.6% (7.5% – 96.3%)

Percentage of cumulative 2-dimensional surface area of all nine standardized re-resection margins as compared to the surface area of the BCS specimen

 

minus the surface area of the overlying skin ellipse

34.9% (8.1% – 98.2%)

  1. BCS, breast-conserving surgery