Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
18 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Renske Steenbergen |
24 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chi-Hung Lin |
22 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
22 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
24 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
24 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
19 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
19 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
3 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
3 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
13 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - JI UN KANG |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
13 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
16 Jul 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Jul 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-237 |
You can find further information about peer review here.