Skip to main content

Table 2 Multi-factorial analysis by three conceptual groups and final model

From: Survival analysis of 1148 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Southern Iran

Variables from the other three multifactorial analyses

Result of final model

 

Hazard ratio (95%CI)

P

**

Hazard ratio (95%CI)

p

Family income

     

   Low & poor

1

0.039

99%

  

   Moderate

0.90 (0.70–1.15)

    

   Good

0.46 (0.23–0.90)

    

Smoking

     

   Non-smoker

1

0.016

99%

  

   Smoker

1.40 (1.07–1.86)

    

Metastasis to bone

     

   No

1

0.000

100%

  

   Yes

2.25 (1.43–3.52)

    

Metastasis to lung

     

   No

1

0.000

100%

  

   Yes

3.21 (1.70–6.05)

    

Tumour size

     

   ≤ 2 cm

1

0.000

88%

1

0.000

   >2 & <5 cm

1.43 (0.97–2.09)

  

1.43 (0.97–2.09)

 

   ≥ 5 cm

2.07 (1.39–3.09)

  

2.07 (1.39–3.10)

 

Tumour grade

     

   Well-differentiated

1

0.000

88%

1

0.000

   Moderately-differentiated

1.30 (0.88–1.93)

  

1.30 (0.88–1.93)

 

   Poorly-differentiated

2.33 (1.52–3.37)

  

2.33 (1.52–3.57)

 

No. of involved lymph nodes

     

   0

1

0.000

88%

1

0.000

   1–5

2.96 (1.78–4.94)

  

2.96 (1.78–4.94)

 

   6–10

5.29 (3.11–9.01)

  

5.29 (3.11–9.01)

 

   11–15

8.29 (4.98–13.80)

  

8.29 (4.98–13.80)

 

   >15

14.96 (8.83–25.33)

  

14.96 (8.83–25.33)

 

Lymph node ratio

     

   0

1

0.000

88%

1

0.000

   > 0 &≤ .3

2.02(1.30–3.13)

  

2.03 (1.09–3.76)

 

   > .3 &≤ .6

4.84 (2.72–8.60)

  

4.84 (2.72–8.60)

 

   > .6 &< 1

9.30 (5.48–15.80)

  

9.30 (5.48–15.80)

 

   1

15.31 (8.89–26.33)

  

15.31 (8.90–26.34)

 
  1. ** Proportion of subjects in multifactorial analysis