Skip to main content

Table 1 Characterization of the main effects of CCND1 and COMT polymorphisms in Ontario and Finland cases.

From: Combined effect of CCND1 and COMT polymorphisms and increased breast cancer risk

  

ONTARIO

FINLAND

CCND1 Activity

Genotype

Controls N (%)

Cases N (%)

OR

95% CI

Controls N (%)

Cases N (%)

OR

95% CI

CCND1Low

GG

217 (30.2)

335 (27.4)

1

-

195 (29)

179 (25.1)

1

-

CCND1Medium

AG

346 (48.1)

573 (46.9)

1.1

0.86–1.33

334 (49.7)

355 (49.8)

1.2

0.9–1.49

CCND1High

AA

156 (21.7)

314 (25.7)

1.3

1.01–1.69

143 (21.3)

179 (25.1)

1.4

1.01–1.84

CCND1Medium/CCND1High

AG/AA

502 (69.8)

887 (72.6)

1.15

0.93–1.4

477 (71)

534 (74.9)

1.22

0.96–1.55

Total

719

1222

  

672

713

  
  

ONTARIO

FINLAND

COMT Activity

Genotype

Controls N (%)

Cases N (%)

OR

95% CI

Controls N (%)

Cases N (%)

OR

95% CI

COMTLow

AA (MetMet)

201 (28.2)

273 (22.4)

1

-

168 (30.60)

206 (29.10)

1

-

COMTMedium

AG (MetVal)

353 (49.5)

642 (52.8)

1.3

1.07–1.68

267 (48.63)

361 (50.99)

1.1

0.85–1.43

COMTHigh

GG (Val)

160 (22.4)

302 (24.8)

1.4

1.07–1.81

114 (20.77)

141 (19.92)

1

0.73–1.39

COMTMedium/COMTHigh

AG (MetVal)/GG(ValVal)

513 (71.9)

944 (77.6)

1.36

1.1–1.67

381 (69.4)

502 (70.91)

1.1

0.85–1.37

Total

714

1217

  

549

708

 Â