Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 May 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ewa Gregoraszczuk |
5 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - nicoletta fortunati |
13 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alfred O Mueck |
15 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Musgrove |
5 Jul 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natalija Eigeliene |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Jul 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ewa Gregoraszczuk |
12 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alfred O Mueck |
17 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - nicoletta fortunati |
20 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Musgrove |
15 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natalija Eigeliene |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Oct 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael MacLeod |
10 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natalija Eigeliene |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natalija Eigeliene |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
16 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
18 Oct 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Oct 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-6-246 |
You can find further information about peer review here.