Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
31 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Hilton Granger |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
31 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - André Nkondjock |
20 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah McNaughton |
28 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teresa Fung |
3 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Hilton Granger |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - André Nkondjock |
18 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Teresa Fung |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
30 Apr 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Hilton Granger |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Apr 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Hilton Granger |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
30 May 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
30 May 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-6-141 |
You can find further information about peer review here.