Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Aug 2004 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Oct 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Mariadason |
15 Nov 2004 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pierfrancesco Marconi |
6 Jan 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Joakim Lundeberg |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Jan 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Jan 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pierfrancesco Marconi |
4 Feb 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Mariadason |
18 Feb 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Joakim Lundeberg |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Feb 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Mar 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Mariadason |
8 Apr 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Joakim Lundeberg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Joakim Lundeberg |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
27 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Joakim Lundeberg |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
29 Jun 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Joakim Lundeberg |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
29 Jun 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
7 Jul 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jul 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-5-75 |
You can find further information about peer review here.