Parameter | Swiercz et al. [23]a | Chautard et al. [22]b,c | Span et al. [32] | Present study | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number and type of Tu tissue samples | 152 RCC (not specified): 105 for uPA, 49 for uPAR, 96 for PAI-1 | 52 RCC (not specified) | 100 RCC: 85 ccRCC, 11 papillary RCC, 4 sarcomatoid | 55 RCC (not specified) | 112 ccRCC |
Number and type of Tf tissue samples | matched normal tissues from RCC kidneys | n = 28: 3 RCC-free kidneys, 18 normal tissues from RCC-kidneys, 7 tissues adjacent to RCC | matched normal tissues from RCC kidneys | matched normal tissues from RCC kidneys | matched normal tissues from RCC kidneys |
ELISA for uPA | American Diagnostica | American Diagnostica | BYK Sangtec Medical (Nichols Laboratory) | self-designed ELISA | American Diagnostica |
ELISA for uPAR | American Diagnostica | American Diagnostica | n.d. | n.d. | American Diagnostica |
ELISA for PAI-1 | self-designed ELISA | American Diagnostica | American Diagnostica, | self-designed ELISA | American Diagnostica |
Tissue processing | detergent tissue extracts | detergent tissue extracts | cytosolic tissue extracts | detergent tissue extracts | detergent tissue extracts |
uPA | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
in Tu | 0.29 | n.p. | 0.091 (0.043 in ccRCC) | 0.50 | 0.41 |
in Tf | 0.286 | n.p. | 0.078 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
Difference between Tu vs Tf | n.s. (Tu = Tf) | P = 0.01 (Tu > Tf) | n.s. (Tu > Tf) | n.s. (Tu < Tf) | P = 0.001 (Tu < Tf) |
uPAR | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
in Tu | 0.78 | n.p. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.51 |
in Tf | 0.30 | n.p. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.52 |
Difference between Tu vs Tf | P = 0.018 (Tu > Tf) | P = 0.007 (Tu > Tf) | n.d. | n.d. | n.s. (Tu = Tf) |
PAI-1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
in Tu | 11.08 | n.p. | 40.8 (38.7 in ccRCC) | 7.26 | 10.3 |
in Tf | 4.221 | n.p. | 5.8 | 0.92 | 3.13 |
Difference between Tu vs Tf | P = 0.02 (Tu > Tf) | P = 0.001 (Tu > Tf) | P < 0.001 (Tu > Tf) | P < 0.001 (Tu > Tf) | P = 0.001 (Tu > Tf) |