Skip to main content

Table 2 Assessment of study quality

From: The effects of psychological interventions on depression and anxiety among Chinese adults with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Studies

Quality Indicators from the modified Jadad scale

Total score

 

A

B

C

D

E

 

Wang et al. 2000 [39]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Zhao et al. 2000 [153]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Cai et al. 2001 [144]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Yang et al. 2002 [42]

1

1

0

1

0

3

Guan et al. 2002 [123]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Li et al. 2002 [76]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Lian et al. 2003 [44]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Wu & Wang 2003 [148]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Zhong et al. 2003 [38]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Lou et al. 2003 [101]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Xu 2004 [115]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Wang 2004 [93]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Bu et al. 2005 [155]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Lou et al. 2005 [164]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Liu et al. 2006 [143]

1

0

1

0

1

3

Cheng et al. 2006 [107]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Wang et al. 2006 [75]

1

0

1

1

0

3

Ni et al. 2007 [165]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Pang & Wang 2007 [166]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Qian & Cai 2007 [50]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Wen & Liang 2007 [69]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Kang 2007 [128]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Zheng et al. 2007 [109]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Deng et al. 2007 [110]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Xing 2007 [103]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Wu et al. 2007 [59]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Xu 2007 [88]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Han & Liu 2007 [151]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Huang et al. 2008 [54]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Zheng et al. 2008 [116]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Yang 2008 [79]

1

1

0

1

0

3

Han 2008 [160]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Jiang et al. 2008 [161]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li et al. 2008 [163]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Wang et al. 2008 [169]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Ji 2008 [106]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Jin & Zhu 2008 [122]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Li et al. 2008 [99]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Liu et al. 2008 [52]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Yang 2008 [136]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Zhou 2008 [100]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Mao et al. 2008 [113]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Liu 2008 [132]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Zheng et al. 2008 [125]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Chen et al. 2009 [156]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Li 2009 [89]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Li et al. 2009 [78]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Fu et al. 2009 [145]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Qiu 2009 [133]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Sun 2009 [134]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Xia 2009 [118]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Zhang 2009 [139]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Zhou 2009 [140]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li et al. 2009 [63]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Geng et al. 2010 [104]

1

0

1

1

1

4

Zhan & Cheng 2010 [105]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Cheng et al. 2010 [45]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li et al. 2010 [91]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Guan et al. 2010 [81]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li 2010 [111]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Zhang 2010 [138]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Su & Wang 2010 [167]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Fu et al. 2010 [159]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Wu & Zhang 2010 [170]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Zhou 2010 [176]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

You et al. 2010 [171]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Ren et al. 2010 [154]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Xu 2010 [40]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Guo et al. 2010 [71]

1

0

1

1

1

4

Tang et al. 2010 [126]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Liu et al. 2010 [46]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Shi et al. 2010 [108]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Liu et al. 2010 [87]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Wang 2010 [90]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Huang et al. 2010 [86]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Zhang & Yu 2011 [94]

1

−1

0

0

0

0

Du et al. 2011 [61]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li et al. 2011 [149]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Zhou et al. 2011 [180]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Liu 2011 [131]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Shen et al. 2011 [64]

1

0

1

1

1

4

Zhu et al. 2011 [65]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Meng et al. 2011 [95]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Dai et al. 2011 [157]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Jiao et al. 2011 [162]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Ye 2011 [56]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Li2011 [130]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Liu et al. 2011 [41]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Wang et al. 2011 [37]

1

−1

1

1

0

2

Cao 2011 [173]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Zhao & Zhang 2011 [174]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Cao & Li 2011 [67]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Huang et al. 2011 [152]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Hu & Yan 2011 [62]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Guan & Jin 2011 [120]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Lv et al. 2011 [77]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Li et al. 2011 [182]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Cao & Jiang 2011 [177]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Huang 2011 [102]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zheng et al. 2011 [141]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Wu & Dong 2011 [47]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zheng et al. 2012 [150]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Wang & Xiao 2012 [124]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Wei 2012 [135]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Feng 2012 [55]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Yang et al. 2012 [73]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zhao et al. 2012 [84]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Gu 2012 [121]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zheng 2012 [58]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Yang 2012 [66]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Sun et al. 2012 [60]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Liu et al. 2012 [98]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Yang et al. 2012 [70]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li 2012 [129]

1

0

1

1

1

4

Zhu & Hu 2012 [68]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Liu 2012 [48]

1

1

0

1

1

4

Shi et al. 2012 [92]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Jia 2012 [127]

1

0

0

1

0

2

Zhang 2012 [97]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Chen 2012 [51]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Li et al. 2012 [146]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Yang & Wang 2012 [83]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Jiang et al. 2012 [49]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Fan & Pan 2012 [158]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

Li et al. 2012 [72]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Han et al. 2012 [85]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zheng et al. 2012 [175]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Yuan & Wu 2013 [147]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zhu et al. 2013 [36]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Du 2013 [74]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Mu et al. 2012 [178]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Liu & Gan 2013 [43]

1

−1

0

1

1

2

Zhang 2013 [96]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zhang et al. 2013 [142]

1

1

0

0

1

3

Guo et al. 2013 [179]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Liu 2013 [119]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Zhai et al. 2013 [82]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Ci et al. 2013 [117]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Liu 2013 [112]

1

0

0

0

0

1

Liu et al. 2013 [57]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Qiu et al. 2013 [181]

1

1

1

1

1

5

Mao et al. 2013 [80]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Zhang 2013 [114]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Yu 2013 [137]

1

0

0

1

1

3

Wang 2013 [53]

1

0

0

0

1

2

Tian et al. 2013 [168]

1

0

1

1

1

4

Yu 2013 [172]

1

−1

0

0

1

1

  1. Note: The modified Jadad scale is an eight-item scale. Considering the characteristic and effect of psychological interventions, blinding (2 points) and adverse effects (1 point) were excluded.
  2. Abbreviations: A represents “Was the study described as randomized?” (1: Yes; 0: No); B represents “Was the method of randomization appropriate?” (1: Yes; 0: Not described; −1: No); C represents “Was there a description of withdrawals and dropouts?” (1: Yes; 0: No); D represents “Was there a clear description of the inclusion/exclusion criteria?” (1: Yes; 0: No); E represents “Was the methods of statistical analysis described?” (1: Yes; 0: No).