Skip to main content
Figure 4 | BMC Cancer

Figure 4

From: Cholesterol-conjugated let-7amimics: antitumor efficacy on hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in a preclinical orthotopic xenograft model of systemic therapy

Figure 4

Systemic Chol-let-7a therapy modulated ras /RAS abundance in HCC orthotopic xenografts. A: Let-7a expression in HepG2 orthotopic xenografts was examined by quantitative real-time PCR. Relative quantification of let-7a was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold (CT) method (2 ΔΔct) with let-7a normalized to U6. The results shown represent the mean and standard error from 3 independent experiments, *p <0.05, **p <0.01 in comparison with controls. T-test: Chol-let-7a vs. Chol-miRCtrl, p = 0.008; Chol-let-7a vs. blank, p = 0.013; Chol-miRCtrl vs. blank, p = 0.128. B: RAS protein expression in xenografts examined by western blotting. KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS protein expression was measured in xenografts by western blotting. Representative data are shown from 2 experiments. C: qRT-PCR analysis of ras mRNA in xenografts. Relative quantification of target genes was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold (CT) method (2 ΔΔct) with genes normalized to GAPDH. The results shown represent the mean and standard error from 3 independent experiments.*p <0.05, ** p <0.01 in comparison with controls. Analysis revealed deregulated expression of k-ras, h-ras, and n-ras mRNA. T-test: n-ras (Chol-let-7a vs. Chol-miRCtrl, p = 0.002; Chol-let-7a vs. blank, p = 0.002; Chol-miRCtrl vs. blank, p = 0.837); h-ras (Chol-let-7a vs. Chol-miRCtrl, p = 0.016; Chol-let-7a vs. blank, p = 0.033; Chol-miRCtrl vs. blank, p = 0.801); and k-ras (Chol-let-7a vs. Chol-miRCtrl, p = 0.041; Chol-let-7a vs. blank, p = 0.005; Chol-miRCtrl vs. blank, p = 0.84).

Back to article page