From: A simple way to measure the burden of interval cancers in breast cancer screening
Reference | Screening program location | Year (of invitation) | Age | Screened women | Screen-detected cases | Interval cancers | Pct. of initial screens | [Screen-detected per 10.000] | [Interval cancers per 10.000] | Background annual incidence rate per 10.000 |
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mammography screening evaluation group [5] | Copenhagen, Denmark | 1993-‘95 | 50-69 | 26,063 | 163 | 53 | 18 | 62.5 | 20.5 | 25.4 | 0.40 | 0.25 (0.19-0.31) |
Njor et al. [6] | Funen, Denmark | 1996-‘97 | 50-69 | 43,543 | 227 | 105 | 19 | 52.1 | 24.2 | 26.0 | 0.47 | 0.32 (0.27-0.37) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Stockholm, Sweden | 1989-‘97 | 50-69 | 270,260 | 1,075 | 584 | 0 | 39.8 | 21.7 | 23.7 | 0.46 | 0.35 (0.33-0.37) |
Hofvind et al.[4] | NBCSP, Norway | 1998-‘05 | 50-69 | 336,323a | 1,648 | 610 | 0 | 49.0 | 18.2 | 18.2 | 0.51 | 0.27 (0.25-0.29) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Pirkanmaa, Finland | 1988-‘97 | 50-69 | 75,927 | 235 | 121 | 42 | 31.0 | 16.0 | 13.1b | 0.61 | 0.34 (0.29-0.39) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Marseille, France | 1993-‘98 | 50-69 | 36,140 | 171 | 65 | 0 | 47.3 | 18.1 | 20.1 | 0.45 | 0.28 (0.22-0.34) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Strasbourg, France | 1989-‘97 | 50-65 | 104,951 | 390 | 230 | 0 | 37.2 | 22.0 | 22.6 | 0.49 | 0.37 (0.33-0.41) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Florence, Italy | 1990-‘94 | 50-69 | 13,394 | 54 | 28 | 0 | 40.3 | 21.0 | 22.2 | 0.47 | 0.34 (0.24-0.44) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Turin, Italy | 1992-‘96 | 50-69c | 13,117 | 82 | 25 | 0 | 62.5 | 19.2 | 20.2d | 0.47 | 0.23 (0.15-0.31) |
Törnberg et al.[7] | Navarra, Spain | 1990-‘96 | 45-65 | 85,653 | 268 | 77 | 0 | 31.3 | 9.0 | 16.2 | 0.28 | 0.22 (0.18-0.26) |