Skip to main content

Table 2 Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for leukaemia, lymphoma and CNS tumours in teenagers and young adults, 1996–2005

From: Population mixing for leukaemia, lymphoma and CNS tumours in teenagers and young adults in England, 1996–2005

  

Leukaemia

Lymphoma

CNS Tumoursb

Modela

Variables

IRR

95% CI

P-value

IRR

95% CI

P-value

IRR

95% CI

P-value

A

Population Mixing

0.92

0.83-1.03

0.144

0.94

0.87-1.01

0.086

0.81

0.74-0.89

<0.001

B

Population Mixing

0.93

0.83-1.04

0.222

0.97

0.90-1.04

0.426

0.83

0.75-0.91

<0.001

 

Deprivation Score

0.99

0.98-1.00

0.114

0.97

0.96-0.98

<0.001

0.97

0.96-0.99

<0.001

C

Population Mixing

0.95

0.84-1.07

0.446

0.97

0.90-1.06

0.529

0.82

0.74-0.91

<0.001

 

Deprivation Score

0.99

0.98-1.01

0.609

0.97

0.96-0.98

<0.001

0.97

0.95-0.99

0.001

 

Population Densityc

1.00

0.99-1.00

0.433

1.00

1.00-1.00

0.820

1.00

0.99-1.00

0.675

D

Population Mixing

         
 

1st Decile

0.93

0.73-1.19

0.572

0.97

0.83-1.14

0.689

1.35

1.13-1.61

0.001

 

2-9th Decile

1

-

-

1

-

-

1

-

-

 

10th Decile

0.9

0.77-1.05

0.168

0.98

0.89-1.09

0.718

0.93

0.81-1.06

0.267

 

Test for Trend

  

0.203

  

0.778

  

0.075

 

Deprivation Score

0.99

0.98-0.99

0.163

0.97

0.96-0.98

<0.001

0.97

0.96-0.98

<0.001

  1. aBest fitting model is highlighted in bold for each diagnostic group, model fit statistics are given in Table 4.
  2. bAnalysis for main CNS tumour subgroups are shown in Table 3.
  3. cPerson-weighted population density.