Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of relationship between Histological grading and prognositic factors

From: Histopathology-based prognostic score is independent prognostic factor of gastric carcinoma

Ā 

Histological grading

P

Variables

H1 (ā‰¤2)

H2 (2ā€“3)

H3 (3ā€“4)

H4 (4ā€“5)

Ā 

Size

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒā‰¤4Ā cm

61

39

117

7

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒ>4Ā cm

153

143

375

37

Ā 

Location

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒLower

150

130

358

35

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒMiddle

34

25

76

6

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒUpper

30

27

58

3

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒEntire

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Macroscopic Type

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒEarly stage

31

18

49

2

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒBorrmann I

10

2

7

1

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒBorrmann II

43

33

63

6

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒBorrmann III

127

123

334

30

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒBorrmann IV

3

6

38

5

Ā 

Lauren grade

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒIntestinal

169

127

194

6

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒDiffuse

45

55

298

38

Ā 

Histologic type

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒDifferentiated

164

141

72

3

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒUn-differentiated

50

41

420

41

Ā 

Depth of tumor

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒT1

30

17

42

1

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒT2

46

36

95

8

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒT3

92

89

223

14

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒT4

46

40

132

21

Ā 

Node metastasis

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒN0

87

55

137

9

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒN1

42

37

83

6

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒN2

44

40

96

9

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒN3

41

50

176

20

Ā 

Lymphovascular invasion

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒNegative

145

104

240

10

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒPositive

77

76

249

35

Ā 

Peritoneal metastasis

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒAbsent

889

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒPresent

43

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Hepatic metastasis

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒAbsent

878

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒPresent

54

Ā Ā Ā Ā