Skip to main content

Table 2 Measurement features of PROMs and included IOM-endorsed patient-centred care dimensions

From: Are we missing the Institute of Medicine’s mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care

Measure

Satisfaction/experience

Number of items

Response scale

Subscales

IOM patient-centred dimensions

Assessment of Patient Experiences of Cancer Care (APECC) [32]

Experiences

33

Not a problem, A small problem, A big problem.

Getting needed care

Emotional support

Timeliness of care

Information & communication

Never, Sometimes, Usually, Always.

Waiting time in physician’s office

Integrated & coordinated care

Information exchange

Respectful to patients’ values

Physicians’ affective behavior

Physicians’ knowledge

On time, < 15 minutes, 16-30 minutes, 31-45 minutes, > 45 minutes.

Interaction with nurses

Interaction with office staff

Health promotion

Coordination of care

Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent.

Overall rating of care

Yes definitely, Yes somewhat, No.

0 (worst doctor possible) to 10 (best doctor possible)

Definitely yes, Probably yes, Not sure, Probably not, Definitely not.

Cancer Care Coordination Questionnaire for Patients [33]

Experiences

20

Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly agree.

Communication

Emotional support

Navigation

Family & friends

Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Frequently, Always.

Information & communication

Integrated & coordinated care

Cancer Patient Information Importance and Satisfaction Tool [34]

Satisfaction

24

5 point scale from Not important (0) to Very important (4).

Information importance

Emotional support

Information satisfaction

Information & communication

Physical comfort

5 point scale from Not satisfied (0) to Very satisfied (4).

Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) [35, 36]

Satisfaction

16

5 point scale with 1 representing the worst response and 5 representing the best response.

Expectation of therapy

Respectful to patients’ values

Feelings about side effects

Satisfaction with therapy

Consumer Quality Index Breast Care (CQI-BC) [37]

Experiences

152 (118 items related to patients’ experiences)

Never, Sometimes, Usually, Always.

Conduct of professionals during breast examination

Emotional support

Information & communication

Yes, No.

Conduct of general practitioner

Integrated & coordinated care

Conduct of nurses

Respectful to patients’ values

A big problem, A small problem, No problem.

Conduct of surgeon

Autonomy regarding treatment

Autonomy regarding follow-up treatment

Conduct of professionals during radiotherapy

Information on radiotherapy

Conduct of professionals during chemotherapy

Information on chemotherapy

Cooperation

Accessibility of care

Continuity psychosocial care

Continuity physiotherapy

Continuity rehabilitation

EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32) [38]

Satisfaction

32

Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent.

Doctors’ technical skills

Emotional support

Doctors’ interpersonal skills

Information & communication

Doctors’ information provision

Integrated & coordinated care

Doctors’ availability

Physical comfort

Nurses’ technical skills

Respectful to patients’ values

Nurses’ interpersonal skills

Nurses’ information provision

Nurses’ availability

Exchange of information

Other hospital staff interpersonal skills and information provision

Waiting time

Hospital access

Comfort

General

satisfaction

Indicators (Head & Neck Cancer) [39]

Experiences

23 specific indicators for patients

-

Patient-oriented quality of care

Emotional support

Organisational quality of care

Information & communication

Medical/technical quality of care

Integrated & coordinated care

Indicators (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer) [40]

Experiences

56

1 = Not done, 2 = Done, but inadequately, 3 = Done adequately, 4 = Done excellently.

Access

Emotional support

Follow up

Family & friends

Communication and respect

Information & communication

Patient & family involvement

Integrated & coordinated care

Yes, No

Information

Physical comfort

Coordination

Respectful to patients’ values

Physical support

Emotional & psychosocial support

Medical Care Questionnaire (MCQ) [41]

Experiences

15

-

Communication

Emotional support

Preferences

Integrated & coordinated care

Coordination

Respectful to patients’ values

Modified Version of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (M-PICS) [42]

Experiences

20

1 = All the time to 5 = Never.

Health care provider information

Information & communication

Patient information

Respectful to patients’ values

Patient decision making

Health care provider facilitation

Oncology Patients’ Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale (OPPQNCS) [43]

Experiences

40 (and 18-item short form created)

1 = Never to 6 = Always, Didn’t matter, Don’t know.

Responsiveness

Emotional support

Individualization

Family & friends

Coordination

Information & communication

Proficiency

Integrated & coordinated care

Respectful to patients’ values

Pain Care Quality Survey (PainCQ) [44, 45]

Experiences

33

1 = Strongly disagree to 6 = Strongly agree.

PainCQ-Interdisciplinary scale:

Family & friends

Partnership with healthcare team

Information & communication

Comprehensive interdisciplinary pain care

Integrated & coordinated care

Physical comfort

PainCQ-Nursing scale:

Respectful to patients’ values

Being treated right

Comprehensive nursing pain care

Efficacy of pain management

PASQOC questionnaire [46]

Satisfaction

120

Nominal or ordinal scales and some interval scales

5 dimensions reported

Information & communication

Patient-provider relationship

Respectful to patients’ values

Premises

Information on diagnosis & treatment

Information on treatment consequences

Relationship between patient & nurse

Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Care [47]

Satisfaction

18

1 = Strongly Agree to 5 = Strongly Disagree

1 component structure – satisfaction with cancer care

Information & communication

Integrated & coordinated care

Respectful to patients’ values

Perceived Physician’s Communication Style Scale [48]

Experiences

27

1 = Strongly Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 5 = Strongly Agree.

Acceptive

Emotional support

Patient-centered

Information & communication

Attentive

Respectful to patients’ values

Facilitative

 

Prostate Care Questionnaire for Patients (PCQ-P) [49]

Experiences

106 (Sections A-E).

Various scales – please see reference [63]

Information from additional file 1

Information & communication

Section A: GP visits and referral

Integrated & coordinated care

Explanation

Physical comfort

Experience of referral

Respectful to patients’ values

Taking the problem seriously

Section B: Tests at the hospital

Explanation & support

Quality of care

Appointment

Section C: Diagnosis and treatment decision

Explanation & support

Making treatment decision

Getting the diagnosis

Length of wait

Section D: Treatment and discharge

Preparation for discharge

Treatment

Information

Section E: Monitoring

Explanation & reassurance

Advice

Choice

QUOTE Breast Cancer [50, 51]

Experiences

33

Performance:

Patient education regarding aspects related to postoperative treatment

Information & communication

Never, Sometimes, Usually, Always.

Integrated & coordinated care

Services by the breast nurse

Respectful to patients’ values

Yes, No.

Services by the surgeon

Patient education regarding activities at home

Not applicable/I do not know added to a subset of items.

Patient education regarding aspects related to preoperative treatment

Importance:

Not important, Fairly important, Important, Extremely important.

QUOTEchemo[52]

Experiences

67

Performance:

Treatment-related information

Emotional support

   

Yes, No.

Prognosis information

Family & friends

Importance:

Rehabilitation information

Information & communication

Coping information

Physical comfort

Not important, Fairly important, Important, Very important.

Interpersonal communication

Respectful to patients’ values

Tailored communication

Affective communication

REPERES-60 [53]

Experiences

60

Bad, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent.

Access to primary care

Emotional support

Access to secondary care

Information & communication

   

Completely agree, Agree generally, No marked opinion, Do not really agree, Do not agree at all.

Competence and communication skills of primary care doctors

Integrated & coordinated care

   

Competence of secondary care doctors

Respectful to patients’ values

   

Communication skills of secondary care doctors

   

Bad, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent, Not concerned.

 
   

Choice among different doctors

   

Human qualities of doctors

   

Global satisfaction

   

Cover for medical expenses

   

Listening abilities and information provided by doctors

   

Organisation and follow-up of medical care provision

   

Psychological support

   

Material environment

Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile (SCIP) [54]

Satisfaction

21

Too much, About right, Too little, None wanted.

Satisfaction with the amount and content of information

Information & communication

   

Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neither, Dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied.

Satisfaction with the form and timing of the information received

 

SAT-RAR [55]

Experiences

23

Poor, Fair, Good, Very good, Excellent.

Perception of the radiotherapist or radiotherapy technicians

Emotional support

Information & communication

Not at all, A little, Quite a bit, Very much.

Global satisfaction

Physical comfort

Treatment experience

Poor, Moderate, Good, Very good, Excellent.

Disagree, Unsure, Tend to agree, Agree, Strongly agree.