Peer Review reports
From: Mammographic density in birth cohorts of Danish women: a longitudinal study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Hellmann |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giske Ursin |
| 4 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andre Verbeek |
| 7 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Hellmann |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giske Ursin |
| 13 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Hellmann |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 13 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Hellmann |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 17 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Sophie Hellmann |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 12 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giske Ursin |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Aug 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Sep 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-13-409 |
You can find further information about peer review here.