Skip to main content

Table 1 Cancer related characteristics in the study and control groups

From: Prognosis of rectal cancer patients improves with downstaging by intensified neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy - a matched pair analysis

 

All patients % (n = 212)

Study group with neoadjuvant treatment % (n = 106)

Control group without neoadjuvant treatment % (n = 106)

p-value

Infiltration (pT)

   

0.02

 yT0

4.2

8.5

0

 

 (y) T1

7.5

5.7

9.8

 

 (y)T2

28.8

27.4

30.2

 

 (y)T3

53.3

54.7

51.9

 

 (y)T4

6.1

3.8

8.5

 

Lymph node metastasis (pN)

   

0.61

Number of nodes examined

17.2

15.3

19.1

<0.001

 (y)N0

51.4

52.8

50.0

 

 (y)N1

25.9

27.4

24.5

 

 (y)N2

22.6

19.8

25.5

 

UICC stage

   

0.31

 UICC 0

1.9

3.8

0

 

 UICC I

27.4

24.5

30.2

 

 UICC II

16.0

17.0

15.1

 

 UICC III

31.1

31.1

31.1

 

 UICC IV

23.6

23.6

23.6

 

R-Category (incl. UICC IV)

   

0.59

 R0

76.8

79.0

74.5

 

 R1

5.2

5.7

4.7

 

 R2

18.0

15.2

20.8

 

V-Category

   

<0.01

 V0

71.1

81.0

61.3

 

 V1

23.7

15.2

32.1

 

 V2

5.2

3.8

6.6

 

L-Category

   

0.08

 L0

80.3

85.4

75.2

 

 L1

19.7

14.6

24.8

 

M-Category

   

1.00

 M0

77.4

77.4

77.4

 

 M1

22.6

22.6

22.6

 

G-Category

   

0.15

 G1

11.4

15.2

7.5

 

 G2

72.0

66.7

77.4

 

 G3

16.6

18.1

15.1

 

Response to neoadjuvant therapy

    

 No response

 

7.5

  

 Poor to moderate regression

 

45.3

  

 Good regression

 

39.6

  

 Complete regression

 

7.5

  

Adjuvant postoperative Radio- chemotherapy (% and patients)

  

52.9 (54 pts.)

 

Completing Chemotherapy after surgery (% and patients)

 

59.4 (60)

  

Localization

   

0.70

 Upper Rectum

4.8

3.8

5.7

 

 Middle Rectum

41.9

40.4

43.4

 

 Lower Rectum

53.3

55.8

50.9

 

Tumorheight (cm)

5.6

5.3

5.9

0.22