Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinicopathological and genetic factors predicting cancer-specific survival

From: Insulin-like growth factor-1 genotypes and haplotypes influence the survival of prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis at initial diagnosis

Univariate analysis

 

Category

HR1

95% CI2

P

Clinical and pathological factors

Age (yrs)

≥ 72 vs. < 72

1.183

0.790 - 1.772

0.415

Gleason score

≥ 9 vs. < 9

1.759

1.151 – 2.687

0.009

PSA (ng/mL)

≥ 260 vs. < 260

1.510

0.992 – 2.299

0.054

HGB (g/dL)

< 11.5 vs. ≥ 11.5

2.251

1.261 – 4.019

0.006

ALP (IU/L)

≥ 350 vs. < 350

2.836

1.756 – 4.578

0.00002

LDH (IU/L)

≥ 500 vs. < 500

2.638

1.442 – 4.829

0.002

Genetic factors

    

LD block 1 (CA repeat)

19 rpts (+) vs. (-)

1.671

1.109 – 2.518

0.014

LD block 2 (rs12423791)

GC + CC vs. GG

1.658

1.102 – 2.495

0.015

LD block 3 (haplotype)

C-T (+) vs. C-T (-)

2.054

1.373 – 3.075

0.0005

Number of risk factors

0 vs. 1–2 vs. 3

1.578

1.208 – 2.060

0.0008

0–2 vs. 3

2.202

1.414 – 3.430

0.0005

Multivariate analysis

    

Full model

    

Age (yrs)

≥ 72 vs. < 72

0.919

0.554 – 1.526

0.745

Gleason score

≥ 9 vs. < 9

1.766

1.052 – 2.966

0.031

PSA (ng/mL)

≥ 265 vs. < 265

0.932

0.496 – 1.749

0.826

HGB (g/dL)

< 11.5 vs. ≥ 11.5

2.012

0.968 – 4.180

0.061

ALP (IU/L)

≥ 350 vs. < 350

2.598

1.483 – 4.551

0.0008

LDH (IU/L)

≥ 500 vs. < 500

1.836

0.977 – 3.448

0.059

LD Block 3 (haplotype)

C-T (+) vs. C-T (-)

2.619

1.559 – 4.399

0.0003

Reduced model

    

Gleason score

≥ 9 vs. < 9

1.709

1.054 – 2.771

0.030

HGB (g/dL)

< 11.5 vs. ≥ 11.5

2.082

1.113 – 3.897

0.022

ALP (IU/L)

≥ 350 vs. < 350

2.819

1.695 – 4.689

0.00007

LD Block 3 (haplotype)

C-T (+) vs. C-T (-)

2.626

1.603 – 4.305

0.0001

  1. 1HR, hazard ratio; 295% CI, 95% confidence interval.