Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thuc Le |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
21 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thuc Le |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rita Zamarchi |
17 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel RIGAUD |
27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thuc Le |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thuc Le |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thuc Le |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Thuc Le |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
11 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-540 |
You can find further information about peer review here.