Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 7 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hein te Riele |
| 4 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chris McCabe |
| 16 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ningzhi Xu |
| 1 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chris McCabe |
| 27 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hein te Riele |
| 15 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-532 |
You can find further information about peer review here.