Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Richman |
2 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frederic Bibeau |
4 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - katia bencardino |
25 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Reinacher-Schick |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Richman |
13 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - katia bencardino |
11 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frederic Bibeau |
23 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Reinacher-Schick |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Richman |
15 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Anke Reinacher-Schick |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
26 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Aug 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-349 |
You can find further information about peer review here.