Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Wilson |
3 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lynne-Marie Postovit |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
27 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Tannock |
8 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Wilson |
16 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lynne-Marie Postovit |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Tannock |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
6 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-214 |
You can find further information about peer review here.