Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 7 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathalie Lamarche-Vane |
| 15 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - eric chevet |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 26 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Shapiro |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nathalie Lamarche-Vane |
| 21 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - eric chevet |
| 6 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Shapiro |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 6 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Paul Shapiro |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.