Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Parviz Behnam-Motlagh |
25 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Quadros |
30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Krissansen |
30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ira Pastan |
20 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Howell |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ira Pastan |
13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Parviz Behnam-Motlagh |
13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Quadros |
18 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geoffrey Krissansen |
26 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Howell |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stephen Howell |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
8 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-61 |
You can find further information about peer review here.