Skip to main content

Table 3 Patients' perspectives on the usefulness and feasibility of the SIPP

From: The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation

Ā 

Scores:

theoretical

range

n

Mean score (SD)

Scores:

observed

range

Negative

perspective (%)a

Score ā‰¤ 4

Moderate

perspective (%)a

Score 5, 6

Positive

perspective

(%)a

Score ā‰„ 7

1. Time to complete the screening instrument

Open question (minutes)

256

5.3 (3.5)

1-20

----

----

----

Instruments' content subscale:

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

2. Understanding the items

0(Not easy to understand)-

10(Easy to understand)

258

8.9 (1.3)

0-10

0.4

2.2

93.7

3. The instrument is pleasant to complete

0(Not pleasant to complete)-

10(Very pleasant to complete)

259

8.4 (1.5)

0-10

1.5

3.7

91.5

4. Importance of the subjects

0(Not important)-

10(Very important)

258

8.0 (1.6)

0-10

1.5

11.5

83.2

Communication aspects subscale:

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

5. Importance of discussing

the screening instrument with radiotherapist

0(Not important)-

10(Very important)

237

7.4 (2.3)

0-10

8.0

12.7

67.5

6. Physical complaints in the screening instrument were discussed with radiotherapist

0(Not discussed) -

10(Extensively discussed)

250

6.2 (3.1)

0-10

18.9

17.9

56.3

7. Psychosocial complaints in the screening instrument were discussed with radiotherapist

0(Not discussed)-

10(Extensively discussed)

249

4.6 (3.6)

0-10

37.3

16.5

39.3

8. Sexual problems in the screening instrument were discussed with radiotherapist

0(Not discussed)-

10(Extensively discussed)

241

1.6 (2.7)

0-10

73.1

7.5

9.3

9. The screening instrument was a useful tool to discuss physical complaints with radiotherapist

0(Not useful)-

10(Very useful)

246

4.1 (3.6)

0-10

43.7

17.5

30.6

10. The screening instrument was a useful tool to discuss psychosocial complaints with radiotherapist

0(Not useful)-

10(Very useful)

242

3.5 (3.6)

0-10

48.4

15.3

26.5

11. The screening instrument was a useful tool to discuss sexual problems with radiotherapist

0(Not useful)-

10(Very useful)

234

1.7 (2.8)

0-10

67.7

10.8

8.9

12. Discussing the screening instrument scores with the radiotherapist was pleasant

0(Not pleasant)-

10(Very pleasant)

223

6.4 (2.7)

0-10

11.2

24.6

47.4

Open questions for remarks

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

13. Is there a subject that was missing from the screening instrument?

No-Yes, namely...

5

----

----

----

----

----

14. Have you any remarks?

No-Yes, namely...

0

----

----

----

----

----

  1. SD: Standard deviation
  2. aDue to possible missing values for several items, not all the scores add up to 100%