Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rebecca siegel |
| 20 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosemary Cress |
| 7 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean Faivre |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - rebecca siegel |
| 17 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosemary Cress |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 19 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean Faivre |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean Faivre |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 30 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jean Faivre |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 30 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 30 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 30 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-282 |
You can find further information about peer review here.