Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lidija Klampfer |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - raymond lai |
22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - cornelis pieter Tensen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ganchimeg Ishdorj |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ganchimeg Ishdorj |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lidija Klampfer |
7 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - raymond lai |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
2 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ganchimeg Ishdorj |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
16 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ganchimeg Ishdorj |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
21 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ganchimeg Ishdorj |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
24 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-268 |
You can find further information about peer review here.