Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jim Waterhouse |
18 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mei-Ling Chen |
29 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - tyvin rich |
26 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - WIlliam Hrushesky |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jim Waterhouse |
7 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mei-Ling Chen |
2 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - tyvin rich |
31 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - WIlliam Hrushesky |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - WIlliam Hrushesky |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
23 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
23 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-193 |
You can find further information about peer review here.