Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dominique Trudel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dominique Trudel |
26 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dong Yan |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
30 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dong Yan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dominique Trudel |
5 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dong Yan |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dong Yan |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
24 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-151 |
You can find further information about peer review here.