Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ada Piepoli |
12 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Konstantin Salnikow |
7 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Libo Yao |
26 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Cathy Mitchelmore |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
26 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Cathy Mitchelmore |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Cathy Mitchelmore |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alex Sánchez-Pla |
12 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Konstantin Salnikow |
11 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Cathy Mitchelmore |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
28 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alex Sánchez-Pla |
14 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Cathy Mitchelmore |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cathy Mitchelmore |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
12 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
12 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-11-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.