Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 16 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - W Elaine Hardman |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chandradhar Dwivedi |
| 16 Nov 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leena Hilakivi-Clarke |
| 18 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - W Elaine Hardman |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - W Elaine Hardman |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Leena Hilakivi-Clarke |
| 20 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chandradhar Dwivedi |
| 11 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - W Elaine Hardman |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 2 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - W Elaine Hardman |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 2 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Mar 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Mar 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-81 |
You can find further information about peer review here.