Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Gibbs |
17 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Owen Franklin Dent |
29 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kho Patricia |
24 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kari Hemminki |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Owen Franklin Dent |
26 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kho Patricia |
7 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Gibbs |
24 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kari Hemminki |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
24 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kari Hemminki |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kari Hemminki |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
20 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kari Hemminki |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
20 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
21 Dec 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Dec 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-688 |
You can find further information about peer review here.