Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - ARADHANA KAUSHAL |
4 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Den |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
27 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Den |
29 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - ARADHANA KAUSHAL |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
22 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-635 |
You can find further information about peer review here.