Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul van Diest |
| 23 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pratyaksha Wirapati |
| 5 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 18 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul van Diest |
| 21 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pratyaksha Wirapati |
| 27 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul van Diest |
| 19 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 27 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 29 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 29 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-604 |
You can find further information about peer review here.