Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul van Diest |
23 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pratyaksha Wirapati |
5 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul van Diest |
21 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pratyaksha Wirapati |
27 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul van Diest |
19 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
29 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Teschendorff |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
29 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
4 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-604 |
You can find further information about peer review here.