Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana deCarvalho |
19 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Geoffrey John Pilkington |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
8 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - MANUEL A. SANCHEZ-MARTIN |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
10 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - MANUEL A. SANCHEZ-MARTIN |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana deCarvalho |
4 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - MANUEL A. SANCHEZ-MARTIN |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
17 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana deCarvalho |
19 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - MANUEL A. SANCHEZ-MARTIN |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
19 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
23 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - MANUEL A. SANCHEZ-MARTIN |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
23 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
24 Aug 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Aug 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-454 |
You can find further information about peer review here.