Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jorg Ellinger |
23 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Slany |
4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ian Ellis |
3 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anjali Advani |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jorg Ellinger |
26 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Slany |
8 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Othus |
22 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anjali Advani |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Othus |
2 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anjali Advani |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
2 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anjali Advani |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
20 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Anjali Advani |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
20 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jul 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jul 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-387 |
You can find further information about peer review here.