Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Re-directed T cells for the treatment of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma (FAPME-1)

  • Ulf Petrausch1Email author,
  • Petra C Schuberth2,
  • Christian Hagedorn2,
  • Alex Soltermann3,
  • Sandra Tomaszek4,
  • Rolf Stahel2,
  • Walter Weder4 and
  • Christoph Renner1, 2
BMC Cancer201212:615

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-615

Received: 5 November 2012

Accepted: 18 December 2012

Published: 22 December 2012



Asbestos is the main cause of MPM in industrialized countries. Even since asbestos is banned in most developed countries, the peak wave of MPM incidence is anticipated for the next years due to the long latency of asbestos induced MPM. MPM patients not eligible for surgical procedures like decortication or pleuro-pneumectomie have a median survival of 12 months with palliative chemotherapy. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are of crucial need in this clinical situation.


This is a phase I trial for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma with pleural effusion testing the safety of a fixed single dose of 1x106 adoptively transferred FAP-specific re-directed T cells given directly in the pleural effusion. Lymphocytes will be taken 21 days before transfer from peripheral blood. CD8 positive T cells will be isolated and re-programmed by retroviral transfer of a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing FAP which serves as target structure in MPM. At day 0 of the protocol, re-directed T cells will be injected in the pleural effusion and patients will be monitored for 48h under intermediate care conditions. AE, SAE, SADR and SUSAR will be monitored for 35 days and evaluated by an independent safety board to define any dose limiting toxicity (DLT). No further patient can be treated before the previous patient passed day 14 after T cell transfer. The protocol will be judged as save when no DLT occurred in the first 3 patients, or 1 DLT in 6 patients. Secondary objectives are feasibility and immune monitoring.


Adoptive T cell transfer is a new and rapidly expanding branch of immunotherapies focusing on cancer treatment. Recently, objective responses could be observed in patients with chronic lymphatic leukemia treated with adoptively transferred CD19-specific re-directed T cells. The choice of the target antigen determines the possible on-target off-tissue toxicity of such approaches. There are reports of severe toxicity in patients who received T cells intravenously due to unexpected expression of the target antigen (on-target) in other tissues than the tumor (off-tissue). To minimize the risk of on-target off-tissue toxicity and to maximize the on-target anti-tumor effect we propose a clinical protocol with loco-regional administration of re-directed T cells. FAP-specific T cells will be directly injected in the pleural effusion of patients with MPM.

Trial registration (NCT01722149)


Malignant pleural mesothelioma

The worldwide incidence of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is still increasing due to the use of asbestos with regional differences ranging from 7 per million (Japan) to 40 per million (Australia) inhabitants per year [1]. In Europe, the annual incidence is about 20 per million inhabitants. Even since asbestos is banned in the industrialized world, it is still widely utilized in developing countries. Therefore, a wave of new cases is predicted in developing countries, for example in India [2].

Even when MPM is diagnosed at limited stage and in patients with good performance status, MPM is an incurable cancer despite the sequential use of different treatment modalities. Neither surgery nor radiotherapy alone has resulted in increased survival [3]. The survival of treated patients has a median of less than 12 months after diagnosis. Recently, the median survival could be improved by the sequential use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, extensive thoracic surgery including pleuro-pneumectomie and adjuvant radiation therapy [46]. However, the median survival is still not exceeding more than 2 years after diagnosis. Since the multi-modal approach is not evaluated prospectively so far, the impact of surgery on MPM is still debated [7]. Ultimately, there are attempts to prospectively test the role of surgery [8]. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) performed a retrospective analysis to identify prognostic factors. Important factors in MPM patients were histological subtype, performance status, and disease stage at time of diagnosis [9].


Due to the unacceptable poor prognosis of MPM patients, new therapeutic approaches have to be developed. Immunotherapy is an attractive approach to add to current therapeutic concepts. Adoptive T cell transfer as part of immunotherapy is already used in clinical trials [10]. The main focus so far has been on the treatment of malignant melanoma due to the fact that melanoma antigens are known to be specific for the respective tumor cells. These so-called tumor-associated antigens (TAA) are the target structure to guide adoptively transferred T cells to the tumor. Over the last years, more and more TAAs became known in other cancer types [11, 12]. However, the tumor consists not only of cancer cells but also of tumor stroma which includes fibroblasts, blood vessels, lymph vessels, and extracellular matrix proteins [13]. The tumor stroma itself appears to be a potential target for immunotherapy due to the over-expression of certain proteins that can act as target structures. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is such a target structure expressed by activated fibroblast in about 90% of all epithelial cancers [14]. We could identify FAP expression in all MPM subtypes (Figure 1). However, one major road block for the induction of TAA-specific T cells is the restricted T cell repertoire. Since the majority of tumor-antigens are self-antigens, no reactive T cell clones are present to recognize the cancer cells as they are deleted in the thymus [15].
Figure 1

For the evaluation of the expression of FAP in MPM immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy was performed with the F19 antibody (A, C) or an irrelevant anti-CD20 antibody only (B, D). Epithelioid (A, B) and sarcomatoid (C, D) MPM were analyzed. FAP staining is depicted in green. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).

Re-directed T cells

The generation of re-directed T cells may overcome this road block of a restricted T cell repertoire as shown by objective responses in patients with chronic lymphatic leukemia treated with CD19-specific re-directed T cells [16]. Re-directed T cells harbor a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that allows for the recognition of tumor-antigens and, therefore, leads to the activation of T cells independently of their original specificity (Figure 2) [17]. Recently, we reported the in vitro and in vivo activity of re-directed T cells targeting NY-ESO-1 positive and HLA2 positive tumors [18]. In parallel, we developed fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-specific re-directed T cells containing an immunoreceptor coding for the scFv recognizing (F19) linked to an IgG-spacer-domain, the CD28 co-stimulatory domain and the CD3ζ chain (Figure 2). Re-directed FAP-specific CD8+ T cells showed antigen-specific functionality in vitro and were protective in a xengraft model (manuscript under review). T cells will be re-directed by gene transfer ex vivo under GMP conditions. The CAR will be transferred into the T cells by retroviral transduction using the pBullet vector system that has already proven its safe use with re-directed T cells in clinical trials [19]. The preparation of the transgene-containing retrovirus supernatant met the quality and safety control criteria [20]. There were no descriptions of any secondary malignancy. However, recently an immune response against the vector system could be detected [21]. To target FAP, we will use the single-chain fragment of the humanised F19 antibody. The murine F19 antibody and a humanized version (sibrotuzumab) have already been used in two phase I trials with 17 patients [22] and 26 patients [23], respectively, and one phase II trial with 25 patients [24]. The biodistribution profile of the radio-labelled antibody in the phase I trial showed specific accumulation in FAP-positive hepatic metastasis of patients with colorectal cancer. No toxicity was observed in this trial [22]. The other trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose. 218 doses were given and only one episode of dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached. The one dose-limiting toxicity was back pain [23]. In the other phase II trial, 5 patients showed drug toxicity including rigors/chills, nausea, flushing and one incidence of bronchospasm [24].
Figure 2

The chimeric antigen receptor F19 is a fusion protein which consists of four functional domains. The scFv F19 serves as binding domain and binds to FAP. The IgG Fc-domain functions as a spacer (hinge); the CD28 signalling domain leads to co-stimulation and the CD3ζ signalling domain activates the T cell if the receptor is cross-linked via antigen binding. The CAR will be expressed in CD8 positive T cells with unknown endogenous specificity.


General study design

This is a phase I trial for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. A fixed single dose of adoptively transferred FAP-specific re-directed T cells will be given in the pleural effusion (Figure 3). Patients are eligible for the trial based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria presented in Tables 1 and 2.
Figure 3

(A) Adoptive transfer of re-directed T cells: (1) 250 ml blood withdrawal at day −21, (2) separation of CD8+ T cells, (3) retroviral transduction of the CAR (+) specific for FAP, (4) adoptive transfer of re-directed T cells day 0. (B) Study course: As concomitant palliative therapy chemotherapy with cycles of 21 days will be given before and after adoptive transfer. Re-directed T cells will be given 14 days after third cycle of palliative chemotherapy into the pleural effusion. Blood draw of 250 ml blood will be performed at day −21 for the production or re-directed T cells. Patients will be continuously monitored at an intermediate care unit (ICU) for the first 48h after the adoptive transfer of re-directed T cells into the pleural effusion (day 0). 30 min before the application of the re-directed T cells 16 mg Dexamethason will be given i.v. as pre-medication. The fourth cycle of palliative chemotherapy will be started 14 days after transfer. Palliative chemotherapy is not part of the study protocol. Radiation therapy is not permitted. Pleurodesis is not allowed until completion of the study. Supportive or other palliative measures are permitted without any exceptions. (C) CT scan of the thorax of a patient with MPM. The tumor nodules are attached to the pleural causing pleural effusion. The schematic syringe represents the application of the re-directed T cells in the pleural infusion resulting in a proximity of re-directed T cells and tumor.

Table 1

Inclusion criteria

Patients fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria may be enrolled in the study

Inclusion criteria:

· Histologically or cytologically confirmed and documented malignant pleural mesothelioma with pleural effusion,

· Male and Female patients 18 years to 75 years of age,

· Signed Informed Consent after being informed,

· Patients medically and/or functionally at screening not accessible for surgical treatment with planned third cycle of palliative chemotherapy in 21 days,

· Bone marrow function: hemoglobin ≥ 100 g/L; white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 3.0 x 109/L; absolute neutrophile count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L; platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L,

· Hepatic: aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)); bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN,

· Renal: creatinine ≤ 2 mg/dL and creatinine clearance ≥ 45 mL/min,

· No concomitant treatment with systemic corticosteroids, or any other immunosuppressive agents,

· The patient has received no major organ allograft,

· HIV-negative,

· HBV and HCV negative,

· No uncontrolled bleeding disorder,

· Patients of child-producing potential must agree to use contraception while enrolled in the study and for 24 months after the adoptive transfer.

Table 2

Exclusion criteria

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the subject:

Exclusion criteria:

· Contra-indications to the class of TpP, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational product,

· Contra-indications on ethical grounds,

· Women who are pregnant or breast feeding,

· Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study,

· Lack of safe contraception:

  Safe contraception is defined as follows:

  Female and male subjects of childbearing potential, using and willing to continue using a medically reliable method of double barrier contraception for the entire study duration and the next 2 years, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices in combination with preservatives. Or subjects who are using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases.

  Please note that subjects who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or post-menopausal for longer than 2 years are not considered as being of child bearing potential.

· Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,

· Patients with medical history of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke or peripheral vascular disease (PVD),

· Patients with medical history of autoimmune disease such as multiple sclerosis, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease or small vessel vasculitis,

· Regular intake of immune-modulating drugs,

· Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia or confusional state of the subject,

· Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,

· Previous enrolment into the current study,

· Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons.

Three patients who are at the time point of screening not operable will be treated with re-directed T cells administered into the pleural effusion after completion of 3 cycles of palliative chemotherapy (Figure 3). In the case of one AE grade III/IV or one SAE - both judged to be treatment related by an independent safety monitoring board - the patient number will be expanded to 6 patients. The study will be stopped if one additional DLT occurs also judged to be treatment related.

Patients will be treated with 1x106 re-directed FAP-specific T cells injected in the pleural effusion. The study ends 35 days after adoptive T cell transfer. Re-directed FAP-specific T cells will be administered at day 0 (day 14 of the third cycle of palliative chemotherapy). The study is designed to demonstrate safety of 1x106 re-directed FAP-specific T cells. The next patient will be enrolled earliest, when the previous patient completed day +14 and the safety monitoring board has not declared any DLTs. The palliative chemotherapy is not part of the study protocol. Due to nature of the study only descriptive statistics will be applied. Means, medians, standard deviations and ranges will be provided for continuous outcomes, and frequencies will be reported for categorical data. The study is approved by the local ethical committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission) of Zurich (KEK-ZH-Nr. 2012/0106), listed at (NCT01722149) and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study objectives

Primary objective

The primary objective is to test safety of a fixed single dose of adoptively transferred FAP-specific re-directed T cells in the pleural effusion. Therefore, all grade III/IV AEs and SAEs will be measured. For the safety assessment, grade III/IV AEs and SAEs will be collected until day +35. The primary safety variables are abnormalities that are judged to be treatment-related and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) by an independent safety monitoring board after the patient passed day +35. Incidence and severity of treatment-related laboratory abnormalities, graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version v4.03 criteria as grade III-IV. The protocol will be judged as save when no DLT occurred in the first 3 patients, or not more than 1 DLT in 6 patients.

Secondary objectives


Number of patients who received re-directed T cells at day 0 of whom 250 ml of blood were taken at day −21. The study protocol will be declared as feasible when all patients from whom blood was taken, have received transduced T cells.

Immune monitoring

Quality of generated re-directed T cells will be tested on day 0. Therefore, frequency assessment of subpopulations of re-directed T cells and assessment of transduction efficacy using flow cytometry will be performed using flow cytometry (monoclonal antibodies: human anti-CD3, human anti-CD4, human anti-CD8, human anti-CD56, human anti-CD28, human anti-CD27, human anti-CD45RA, human anti-CCR7, human anti-IgG). Antigen-specific IFNγ-release after stimulation with FAP expressing cells will be used to test for T cell function. Furthermore, cytotoxicity assays will be performed to determine antigen-specific cell killing after stimulation with FAP expressing cells. The cytokine composition of pleural effusion will be measured at days 0 and +2 by ELISA for IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β, TNF-α and IFNγ to assess the local microenvironment. In parallel, the cytokine composition of peripheral serum will be analysed on days −21, 0, +1, +2 and +7 by ELISA for IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β, TNF-α and IFNγ. The number of re-directed T cells will be measured in the peripheral blood on days −21, 0, +1, +2, +7 by flow cytometry (human anti-IgG mAB and human anti-CD8 mAB) to assess for lymphocyte migration out of the pleural cavity.

Dose rationale

This study is designed to show safety of a single dose. Therefore, we do not plan for a dose escalation. We decided to take the lowest dose of re-directed T cell recommended for second generation (CD28 signaling domain) CARs targeting a so far not tested tumor related antigen (FAP) [25]. We will administer 1x 106 re-directed T cells into the pleural effusion.


First-line chemotherapy is the standard treatment option for patients not assessable for surgery. Since palliative first-line chemotherapy results in a median overall survival of 12 months, new therapeutic approaches have to be developed. Therefore, we proposed a concept of loco-regional adoptive transfer of re-directed T cells. We demonstrated target expression of FAP in all subtypes of MPM. Thus, FAP-specific re-directed T cells can be employed in the proposed clinical protocol. The clinical data, so far, using F19 (murine anti-FAP mAB) or sibrotuzumab (humanized F19) showed antibody accumulation in the tumor tissue indicating target specificity [22]. However, the clinical response to both antibody forms was marginal [23]. In contrast to antibodies, re-directed FAP-specific T cells will make use of the specificity of a humanised F19 antibody and combine it with the cytotoxic machinery of CD8 positive effector T cells [26]. Therefore, we expect increased clinical responses [27]. However, the here presented protocol is not intended to proof efficacy.

The main advantage of the loco-regional application of re-directed T cells is the avoidance of immediate systemic side-effects, since the re-directed T cells will not be systemically distributed by blood flow as if administered intravenously. Intravenous application can lead to an interaction of FAP re-directed T cells with off-target tissue leading to immunological mediated toxicity [25]. On-target off-tissue toxicity has to be addressed as first goal. Due to the fact that FAP is expressed in chronically inflamed tissue [28, 29], off-target toxicity has to be taken into consideration. Furthermore, FAP expression could be found in fibroatheromata [30]. Therefore, patients with a medical history of autoimmune diseases and/or coronary heart disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease are excluded from the study. More related to the systemic delivery of T cells, massive cytokine release could be caused by adoptively transferred T cells. There is one report describing an adverse event resulting in the death of a patient after the adoptive transfer of ERBB2 specific re-directed T cells [31]. The cause of death could be partially explained by a cytokine storm. The here presented study is differently designed. Re-directed T cells will not be given intravenously; therefore, a rapid and uncontrolled systemic contact to FAP positive tissue is not likely [32]. The patients are not lympho-depleted by palliative chemotherapy; therefore, clonal competition for cytokines can still take place and lowers the activation of transferred re-directed T cells [33]. Nevertheless, re-directed T cells may expand and migrate outside the pleural effusion and cause in the acute phase anaphylaxis and ARDS within the first 48h. Later on, chronic inflammation can be induced at different sites. Since this trial is the first trial evaluating FAP-specific re-directed T cells in the pleural effusion, all enrolled patients will be treated with the lowest suggested number of cells [25] and monitored for the first 48h at an intermediate care unit.

With the herein presented trial we propose a clinical trial design to test the safety of pre-clinically evaluated FAP specific re-directed T cells for loco-regional intrapleural therapy in patients with MPM.



Adverse Event


Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome


Chimeric antigen receptor


Cluster of Differentiation


Dose limiting toxicity (DLT)


Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay


Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status


Fibroblast activation protein






Intermediate Care Unit


monoclonal Antibody


Malignant pleural mesothelioma


Suspected adverse drug reaction


Serious Adverse Event


Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction


Tumor associated antigen


Tumor growth factor


Tumor necrosis factor


Transplantation product.



Until submission of this manuscript, this study is supported by the initiative “Highly Specialized Medicine“of the Kanton Zurich, Switzerland.

The clinical trial was designed at the 12th joint ECCO-AACR-EORTC-ESMO Workshop ‘Methods in Clinical Cancer Research’, Waldhaus Flims, Switzerland, 19 – 25 June 2010.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Immunology, University Hospital Zurich
Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich
Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich
Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich


  1. Robinson BW, Lake RA: Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353 (15): 1591-1603. 10.1056/NEJMra050152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchi C, Bianchi T: Malignant mesothelioma: global incidence and relationship with asbestos. Ind Health. 2007, 45 (3): 379-387. 10.2486/indhealth.45.379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fennell DA, Gaudino G, O'Byrne KJ, Mutti L, van Meerbeeck J: Advances in the systemic therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008, 5 (3): 136-147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Opitz I, Kestenholz P, Lardinois D, Muller M, Rousson V, Schneiter D, Stahel R, Weder W: Incidence and management of complications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006, 29 (4): 579-584. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Weder W, Opitz I, Stahel R: Multimodality strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009, 21 (2): 172-176. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sugarbaker DJ, Garcia JP, Richards WG, Harpole DH, Healy-Baldini E, DeCamp MM, Mentzer SJ, Liptay MJ, Strauss GM, Swanson SJ: Extrapleural pneumonectomy in the multimodality therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Results in 120 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 1996, 224 (3): 288-294. 10.1097/00000658-199609000-00005. discussion 294–286View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Zahid I, Sharif S, Routledge T, Scarci M: Is pleurectomy and decortication superior to palliative care in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011, 12 (5): 812-817. 10.1510/icvts.2010.256271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Treasure T: Surgery for mesothelioma: MARS landing and future missions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010, 37 (3): 509-510. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.08.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Francart J, Vaes E, Henrard S, Legrand C, Baas P, Gaafar R, van Meerbeeck JP, Sylvester R, Robert A: A prognostic index for progression-free survival in malignant mesothelioma with application to the design of phase II trials: a combined analysis of 10 EORTC trials. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (13): 2304-2311. 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. June CH: Adoptive T cell therapy for cancer in the clinic. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117 (6): 1466-1476. 10.1172/JCI32446.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Renkvist N, Castelli C, Robbins PF, Parmiani G: A listing of human tumor antigens recognized by T cells. Canc Immunol Immunother. 2001, 50 (1): 3-15. 10.1007/s002620000169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Novellino L, Castelli C, Parmiani G: A listing of human tumor antigens recognized by T cells: March 2004 update. Canc Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54 (3): 187-207. 10.1007/s00262-004-0560-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Rasanen K, Vaheri A: Activation of fibroblasts in cancer stroma. Exp Cell Res. 2010, 316 (17): 2713-2722. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Park JE, Lenter MC, Zimmermann RN, Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ: Fibroblast activation protein, a dual specificity serine protease expressed in reactive human tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (51): 36505-36512. 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Klein L, Hinterberger M, Wirnsberger G, Kyewski B: Antigen presentation in the thymus for positive selection and central tolerance induction. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009, 9 (12): 833-844. 10.1038/nri2669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH: Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in Chronic Lymphoid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011, 365 (8): 725-733. 10.1056/NEJMoa1103849.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Pinthus JH, Waks T, Malina V, Kaufman-Francis K, Harmelin A, Aizenberg I, Kanety H, Ramon J, Eshhar Z: Adoptive immunotherapy of prostate cancer bone lesions using redirected effector lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 2004, 114 (12): 1774-1781.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Stewart-Jones G, Wadle A, Hombach A, Shenderov E, Held G, Fischer E, Kleber S, Nuber N, Stenner-Liewen F, Bauer S, et al: Rational development of high-affinity T-cell receptor-like antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (14): 5784-5788. 10.1073/pnas.0901425106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamers CH, Sleijfer S, Vulto AG, Kruit WH, Kliffen M, Debets R, Gratama JW, Stoter G, Oosterwijk E: Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with autologous T-lymphocytes genetically retargeted against carbonic anhydrase IX: first clinical experience. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (13): e20-e22. 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lamers CH, van Elzakker P, Langeveld SC, Sleijfer S, Gratama JW: Process validation and clinical evaluation of a protocol to generate gene-modified T lymphocytes for imunogene therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: GMP-controlled transduction and expansion of patient's T lymphocytes using a carboxy anhydrase IX-specific scFv transgene. Cytotherapy. 2006, 8 (6): 542-553. 10.1080/14653240601056396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamers CH, Willemsen R, van Elzakker P, van Steenbergen-Langeveld S, Broertjes M, Oosterwijk-Wakka J, Oosterwijk E, Sleijfer S, Debets R, Gratama JW: Immune responses to transgene and retroviral vector in patients treated with ex vivo-engineered T cells. Blood. 2011, 117 (1): 72-82. 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Welt S, Divgi CR, Scott AM, Garin-Chesa P, Finn RD, Graham M, Carswell EA, Cohen A, Larson SM, Old LJ, et al: Antibody targeting in metastatic colon cancer: a phase I study of monoclonal antibody F19 against a cell-surface protein of reactive tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Clin Oncol. 1994, 12 (6): 1193-1203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Scott AM, Wiseman G, Welt S, Adjei A, Lee FT, Hopkins W, Divgi CR, Hanson LH, Mitchell P, Gansen DN, et al: A Phase I dose-escalation study of sibrotuzumab in patients with advanced or metastatic fibroblast activation protein-positive cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9 (5): 1639-1647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofheinz RD, al-Batran SE, Hartmann F, Hartung G, Jager D, Renner C, Tanswell P, Kunz U, Amelsberg A, Kuthan H, et al: Stromal antigen targeting by a humanised monoclonal antibody: an early phase II trial of sibrotuzumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Onkologie. 2003, 26 (1): 44-48. 10.1159/000069863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ertl HC, Zaia J, Rosenberg SA, June CH, Dotti G, Kahn J, Cooper LJ, Corrigan-Curay J, Strome SE: Considerations for the clinical application of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: observations from a recombinant DNA Advisory Committee Symposium held June 15, 2010. Cancer Res. 2011, 71 (9): 3175-3181. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4035.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Curran KJ, Pegram HJ, Brentjens RJ: Chimeric antigen receptors for T cell immunotherapy: current understanding and future directions. J Gene Med. 2012, 14 (6): 405-415. 10.1002/jgm.2604.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA: Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012, 12 (4): 269-281. 10.1038/nri3191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bauer S, Jendro MC, Wadle A, Kleber S, Stenner F, Dinser R, Reich A, Faccin E, Godde S, Dinges H, et al: Fibroblast activation protein is expressed by rheumatoid myofibroblast-like synoviocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006, 8 (6): R171-10.1186/ar2080.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ospelt C, Mertens JC, Jungel A, Brentano F, Maciejewska-Rodriguez H, Huber LC, Hemmatazad H, Wuest T, Knuth A, Gay RE, et al: Inhibition of fibroblast activation protein and dipeptidylpeptidase 4 increases cartilage invasion by rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62 (5): 1224-1235. 10.1002/art.27395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brokopp CE, Schoenauer R, Richards P, Bauer S, Lohmann C, Emmert MY, Weber B, Winnik S, Aikawa E, Graves K, et al: Fibroblast activation protein is induced by inflammation and degrades type I collagen in thin-cap fibroatheromata. Eur Heart J. 2011, 32 (21): 2713-2722. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq519.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, Rosenberg SA: Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther. 2010, 18 (4): 843-851. 10.1038/mt.2010.24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Parente-Pereira AC, Burnet J, Ellison D, Foster J, Davies DM, van der Stegen S, Burbridge S, Chiapero-Stanke L, Wilkie S, Mather S, et al: Trafficking of CAR-engineered human T cells following regional or systemic adoptive transfer in SCID beige mice. J Clin Immunol. 2011, 31 (4): 710-718. 10.1007/s10875-011-9532-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Muranski P, Boni A, Wrzesinski C, Citrin DE, Rosenberg SA, Childs R, Restifo NP: Increased intensity lymphodepletion and adoptive immunotherapy–how far can we go?. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006, 3 (12): 668-681.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Petrausch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.