Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome that is commonly associated with a germline mutation in the tumor suppressor gene p53. Loss of p53 results in increased expression of CD44, a cancer stem cell (CSC) marker, which is involved in the scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Here, we report a change in the expression of a CD44 variant isoform (CD44v8-10) in an 8-year-old female LFS patient with osteosarcoma and atypical liver cancer after chemotherapy.
The patient visited a clinic with a chief complaint of chronic pain in a bruise on her right knee. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) raised the possibility of a bone malignancy. Biochemical testing also revealed significantly elevated levels of AFP, which strongly suggested the existence of a primary malignancy in the liver. MRI imaging showed the simultaneous development of osteosarcoma and liver cancer, both of which were confirmed upon biopsy. Combined therapy with surgical resection after chemotherapy was successful in this patient. Regardless of the absence of a familial history of hereditary cancer, a germline mutation in p53 was identified (a missense mutation defined as c.722 C>T, p.Ser241Phe). To better understand the cancer progression and response to treatment, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of biopsy specimens obtained before and after chemotherapy was performed using a specific antibody against CD44v8-10.
This case demonstrates the ectopic up-regulation of CD44v8-10 in a biopsy sample obtained after cytotoxic chemotherapy, which confers high levels of oxidative stress on cancer cells. Because the alternative splicing of CD44 is tightly regulated epigenetically, it is possible that micro-environmental stress resulting from chemotherapy caused the ectopic induction of CD44v8-10 in vivo.
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a familial cancer predisposition syndrome, which is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. This syndrome is most frequently associated with soft tissue sarcoma, osteosarcoma, pre-menopausal breast cancer, brain cancer, and adrenocortical carcinoma, but it can also result in other types of tumors. LFS is classified into two major subgroups: classic LFS and Li-Fraumeni-like (LFL) syndrome, which shares some, but not all, of the features of LFS
[1–3]. Juvenile development of simultaneous and multiple cancers raises the possibility of LFS.
Sequence analysis of the entire p53 coding region (exons 2–11) detects about 95% of p53 mutations, most of which are missense mutations. A functional assay may be useful for determining the clinical significance of novel missense mutations
. It has been indicated that approximately 70% of LFS patients and 8–22% of patients with LFL syndrome have detectable p53 mutations
. Comprehensive analyses of genotype-phenotype correlations have led to a better understanding of tumors that are associated with germline p53 mutations
CD44 is an adhesion molecule for extracellular matrix components such as hyaluronic acid and osteopontin
, and plays an important role not only in wound healing and cell migration, but also in tumor invasion and metastasis. CD44 has numerous isoforms generated through alternative mRNA splicing. For instance, CD44v6 interacts with c-Met, the receptor of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), thereby increasing the survival and proliferative ability of tumor cells That is one of the reasons why the expression of the CD44 splice variant CD44v6 is correlated with the metastasis of colon cancer to the liver and a poor clinical prognosis
. CD44 has been recently identified as one of the cellular surface markers associated with cancer stem cells (CSCs) in several types of tumors. Notably, CD44 variants (CD44v) are exclusively expressed in epithelial-type cells, whereas the CD44 standard isoform (CD44s) is expressed in both epithelial and mesenchymal cells
Loss-of-functional mutations in the p53 gene promote tumor development. CD44 expression is generally suppressed by p53 binding to the CD44 promoter, so that increased expression of CD44 is detected in tumor cells with mutant p53.
CSCs are defined as the small population of cancer cells with multi-lineage differentiation potential. These self-sustaining cells have the exclusive ability to self-renew and maintain the tumor tissue
. CSCs often fail to respond to chemotherapy, thereby causing distant metastasis and latent relapse. For this reason, we focused on the change in tumor expression of CD44 as a result of chemotherapy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy is expected to be enriched in CSCs compared with the pre-chemotherapy tumor specimen.
Alternative splicing is mainly responsible for the diversity of CD44 isoforms. Among these variants, CD44v8-10 enhances reduced glutathione (GSH) synthesis by stabilizing the xCT transport system for cysteine, the precursor of GSH. Hence, CSCs acquire an enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) defense system
. Cytotoxic drugs such as Adriamycin induce apoptosis by causing oxidative stress, which damages DNA. To better understand the influence of oxidative stress on the tumor microenvironment, changes in the expression of CD44v8-10 were evaluated in response to chemotherapy. We hypothesized that oxidative stress due to the administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy would affect the expression of CD44v8-10 in p53-mutated cancer cells in this patient.
An 8-year-old female slipped on the stairs and had a bruise on her right knee. However, since the pain persisted, the patient visited a nearby orthopedic clinic. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the possibility of a bone malignancy (Figure
1). The patient was then admitted to the hospital for further examination. Biochemical testing revealed significantly elevated levels of both serum AFP (AFP: 79016 ng/ml, L3: 3555 ng/ml (4.5%), PIVKA-II: 128 IU/l), which suggested possible malignancy of the liver. A serum AFP level as high as 79,000 ng/ml was also indicative of a liver tumor. Antibodies against hepatitis virus B and C were not detected. The development of hepatoblastoma was atypical in terms of the age of onset, given that hepatoblastomas typically arise in patients under 3 years of age. Pathological diagnosis was transitional liver cell tumor (TLCT). A subset of liver cell tumors in older children and adolescents may develop as an intermediate between blastomatous tumors and adult-type tumors. This type of tumor, referred to as TLCT, is highly dependent on Wnt signaling than other categories of liver tumors
. MRI imaging showed the simultaneous development of osteosarcoma and liver cancer (Figure
1), both of which were confirmed by biopsy. After two courses of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hepatoblastoma (a combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and tetrahydropyranyl-adriamycin (THP-ADR)), the residual liver tumor was removed completely by surgical extended lobectomy. After treatment with the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocol for osteosarcoma (a combination of CDDP, ifosfamide (IFO), and methotrexate (MTX)), the diminished osteosarcoma was totally resected and an artificial joint was placed. The levels of transitional serum biomarkers for the liver tumor and osteosarcoma are shown (Figure
2), in which the blue arrows indicate repeated neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To date, there has been no sign of relapse or latent metastasis for about two years after last surgery. Combined therapy with surgical resection after chemotherapy was, therefore, successful in this patient. Given that we found the simultaneous development of a liver tumor and osteosarcoma, we performed genetic testing to evaluate the patient’s susceptibility to malignancy. Despite the absence of a familial history of hereditary cancer, a germline mutation in p53 (c.722 C>T, p.Ser241Phe) was identified. Notably, the frequency of de novo mutations in LFS is between 7% and 20%
; it is, therefore, conceivable that the p53 mutation occurred de novo during embryonic development.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the patient’s tumors prior to and following chemotherapy was performed using an antibody against the human CD44 variant isoform. CD44v8-10 was not expressed in both the liver tumor and the osteosarcoma before chemotherapy, but was ectopically expressed after chemotherapy (Figure
Discussion and conclusion
CD44 exists in as many as 16 different isoforms, which are generated through alternative mRNA splicing. CD44v8-10 is generated by epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1 (ESRP1), an RNA-binding protein
. Whereas the standard CD44 isoform (CD44s), which contains exons 1–5 and 16–20, is expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells and normal epithelial cell subsets, CD44 variant isoforms with insertions in the membrane-proximal extracellular region are abundant in epithelial-type cancers, including liver tumors. Recently, CD44v8-10 was reported to have a novel function; it inhibits oxidative stress in tumor cells by promoting the GSH synthesis
. However, exactly transcriptional factors or epigenetic mechanisms controlling the induction of ESRP1, the master regulator of CD44v8-10, remain unclear
. We have already performed IHC using the specific antibody against human ESRP1 and ESRP2. Unfortunately, there was no antibody which was suitable for IHC due to reactions to the non-specific antigens, so that we could not obtain data that shows ESRP1 or ESRP2 exclusively in the nucleus (data not shown).
Osteosarcoma originates from mesenchymal tissue, not epithelial tissue, meaning that the CD44 variant isoforms expressed in osteosarcoma may have a completely different function from those expressed in liver cancer. Whereas the function of CD44v8-10 in osteosarcoma is unknown, the only v6 expression is negatively correlated with 5-year metastasis-free survival. Therefore, overexpression of the variant isoform, CD44v6, is considered a poor prognostic marker in patients with osteosarcoma
. However, no specific data has been reported regarding the biological significance of CD44v8-10 in osteosarcoma. The cytotoxic drugs CDDP and THP-ADR increase the ROS level in cancer cells, thereby inducing DNA damage and apoptosis. It is possible that CD44v8-10 is induced following chemotherapy in osteosarcoma to counteract this oxidative stress.
Considering the lack of familial history of malignancy in this case, it is supposed that the de novo p53 germline mutation occurred during early development. The p53 protein suppresses expression of CD44 by binding to the promoter region of CD44
, and CD44v8-10 was not expressed in both tumors before chemotherapy. The absence of p53 likely enabled the upregulation of CD44v8-10 in response to chemotherapy. However, this finding does not rule out the possibility that other CD44 isoforms were fully expressed prior to chemotherapy. Although cancer cells may acquire resistance to oxidative damage by upregulating CD44v8-10, there has been no sign of relapse or metastasis so far in this patient. The fact that CD44v8-10 expression was not correlated with increased malignant potential in this case seems to be contradictory to our previous research
; however, the effect of CD44v8-10 expression may depend on the origin of the tumor. It is possible that CD44v8-10 may function differently in hepatic tumors and osteosarcomas with p53 mutations than in gastric and colorectal cancers.
Potential mechanisms for the ectopic induction of CD44v8-10 expression in osteosarcoma are shown (Figure
a) Cancer cells expressing CD44v8-10 may have existed in the original tumor, but were too rare to be detected by IHC. These cells survived even under conditions of oxidative stress caused by cytotoxic chemotherapy.
b) Cancer cells expressing CD44v8-10 did not exist originally, but the oxidative stress caused by chemotherapy induced the expression of CD44v8-10 in the tumor.
Differentiating between these possibilities will require further investigation into how the alternative splicing machinery for CD44 is affected by chemotherapy. There has been no sign of relapse or metastasis so far in this patient, but it will be crucial to gather additional data regarding CSC molecular dynamics during the course of chemotherapy. Therefore, a larger number of cancer cases need to be analyzed, and longer-term follow-up studies must be conducted, to confirm the results of this study.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and the accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review upon request.
Cancer stem cell
Reactive oxygen species
Magnetic resonance imaging
Minimal residual disease
Transitional liver cell tumor
Epithelial splicing regulatory protein 1
We thank Hideyuki Saya, M.D., Ph.D. for review the manuscript and helpful comments, and Hirofumi Tomita, M.D., Motohiro Kano, M.D., for manuscript preparation.
Division of Gene Regulation, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine
Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Subspecialities, National Center for Child Health and Development
Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine
Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University Hospital
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine
Department of Pediatric Surgey, Keio University School of Medicine
Li FP, Fraumeni JF Jr: Soft-tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, and other neoplasms. A familial syndrome?Ann Intern Med 1969,71(4):747–752.PubMed
Malkin D, et al.: Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms.Science 1990,250(4985):1233–1238.PubMedView Article
Hisada M, et al.: Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.J Natl Cancer Inst 1998,90(8):606–611.PubMedView Article
Yamada H, et al.: Identification and characterization of a novel germline p53 mutation in a patient with glioblastoma and colon cancer.Int J Cancer 2009,125(4):973–976.PubMedView Article
Birch JM, et al.: Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families.Cancer Res 1994,54(5):1298–1304.PubMed
Varley JM: Germline TP53 mutations and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.Hum Mutat 2003,21(3):313–320.PubMedView Article
Nagano O, Saya H: Mechanism and biological significance of CD44 cleavage.Cancer Sci 2004,95(12):930–935.PubMedView Article
Jothy S: CD44 and its partners in metastasis.Clin Exp Metastasis 2003,20(3):195–201.PubMedView Article
Warzecha CC, et al.: The epithelial splicing factors ESRP1 and ESRP2 positively and negatively regulate diverse types of alternative splicing events.RNA Biol 2009,6(5):546–562.PubMedView Article
Godar S, et al.: Growth-inhibitory and tumor- suppressive functions of p53 depend on its repression of CD44 expression.Cell 2008,134(1):62–73.PubMedView Article
Clarke MF, et al.: Cancer stem cells–perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells.Cancer Res 2006,66(19):9339–9344.PubMedView Article
Ishimoto T, et al.: CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc(−) and thereby promotes tumor growth.Cancer Cell 2011,19(3):387–400.PubMedView Article
Prokurat A, et al.: Transitional liver cell tumors (TLCT) in older children and adolescents: a novel group of aggressive hepatic tumors expressing beta-catenin.Med Pediatr Oncol 2002,39(5):510–518.PubMedView Article
Gonzalez KD, et al.: High frequency of de novo mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.J Med Genet 2009,46(10):689–693.PubMedView Article
Kuryu M, et al.: Expression of CD44 variants in osteosarcoma.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1999,125(11):646–652.PubMedView Article
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.