A phenanthrene derived PARP inhibitor is an extra-centrosomes de-clustering agent exclusively eradicating human cancer cells
- Asher Castiel†4,
- Leonid Visochek†1,
- Leonid Mittelman3,
- Françoise Dantzer5,
- Shai Izraeli2, 4 and
- Malka Cohen-Armon1Email author
© Castiel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 May 2011
Accepted: 26 September 2011
Published: 26 September 2011
Cells of most human cancers have supernumerary centrosomes. To enable an accurate chromosome segregation and cell division, these cells developed a yet unresolved molecular mechanism, clustering their extra centrosomes at two poles, thereby mimicking mitosis in normal cells. Failure of this bipolar centrosome clustering causes multipolar spindle structures and aberrant chromosomes segregation that prevent normal cell division and lead to 'mitotic catastrophe cell death'.
We used cell biology and biochemical methods, including flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry and live confocal imaging.
We identified a phenanthrene derived PARP inhibitor, known for its activity in neuroprotection under stress conditions, which exclusively eradicated multi-centrosomal human cancer cells (mammary, colon, lung, pancreas, ovarian) while acting as extra-centrosomes de-clustering agent in mitosis. Normal human proliferating cells (endothelial, epithelial and mesenchymal cells) were not impaired. Despite acting as PARP inhibitor, the cytotoxic activity of this molecule in cancer cells was not attributed to PARP inhibition alone.
We identified a water soluble phenanthridine that exclusively targets the unique dependence of most human cancer cells on their supernumerary centrosomes bi-polar clustering for their survival. This paves the way for a new selective cancer-targeting therapy, efficient in a wide range of human cancers.
We have recently reported the selective eradication of human triple negative mammary cancer cells MDA-231 by phenanthrene derivatives (also acting as potent inhibitors of polyADP-ribose polymerases) . These compounds included the phenanthridines PJ-34 and Phen and the isoquiniline Tiq-A. They were originally designed to protect neuronal cells in the central nervous system from cell death evoked by high activity of PARP-1 in response to DNA damage caused by brain injury, stroke or inflammation [2, 3]. We found that these molecules cause G2/M transition arrest in the cell cycle of both mammary cancer cells MDA-231 and normal epithelial cells MCF-10. However, while G2/M arrest was permanent in the cancer cells, and was accompanied by their massive cell death, normal mammary epithelial cells overcame the cell cycle arrest and continued to proliferate normally in the presence of these phenanthrene derivatives . The most potent compound was PJ-34, which also efficiently prevented the development of MDA-231 xenotransplants in nude mice without inducing detectable toxic effects in the animals .
The current results outline a mechanism that apparently underlies the exclusive cytotoxicity of PJ-34 in these human mammary cancer cells. We found that this molecule acts as a centrosomes de-clustering agent in cells with supernumerary centrosomes, which are most abundant in these mammary cancer cells and in most human cancers [4, 5].
Bipolar centrosomes assembly during metaphase is crucial for bipolar spindle formation and accurate chromosomes segregation in cells undergoing mitosis [6, 7]. To accomplish these tasks, cells dividing with more than two centrosomes have developed a yet unresolved molecular mechanism, clustering their extra-centrosomes at two poles [4, 5, 8]. Failure of this bipolar centrosome assembly causes multipolar spindle structures and aberrant chromosomes segregation that prevent normal cell division . This may lead either to 'mitotic slippage' where cells 'slip' out of mitosis to re-enter G1 without satisfying the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), or to induction of 'mitotic catastrophe cell death' [5, 9, 10] or 'anaphase catastrophy' . Although cell death induced by failure to accomplish mitosis has been well documented, the underlying molecular mechanisms are still poorly understood [5, 10]
Extra centrosomes are most abundant in cells of human solid cancers and in some of the human hematological malignancies [4, 5], whereas in normal somatic cells the number of centrosomes is restricted, via several control mechanisms, to two centrosomes per cell [8, 9, 11]. This difference between normal and cancer human cells raised the idea of using compounds that interfere with the bipolar clustering of extra centrosomes to achieve selective eradication of cancer cells without harming normal tissues [5, 12].
Our findings confirm this hypothesis by identifying a molecule, which prevents extra centrosomes clustering in mitosis and exclusively eradicates human cancer cells with supernumerary centrosomes without impairing normal proliferating cells.
Cells and cell cultures
Human cancer cell lines included mammary triple negative (MDA-231) cells, lung (H1299), colon (DLD-1), ovarian (HeyA8), and pancreatic (Panc-1) cells. These cell-lines and the human epithelial cell line MCF-10A were supplied by ATCC, (Manassas, VA, USA). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (Huvec) were supplied by PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany), and human primary adipose-derived mesenchymal stroma cells were prepared from human thymus and kindly donated by Prof Jonathan Leor (Sheba Medical Center, Israel). The human cancer cell lines were chosen for our experiments as representatives of human cancer cells with high occurrence of extra-centrosomes.
Cancer cell lines were cultured in 6-well multi-dish plates (Nunc; Roskilde, Denmark) and maintained in a medium containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% horse serum, 1% L-glutamine, and 1% Pen-Strep-Amphotericin B (Gibco, UK). Epithelial MCF-10A cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco, UK) containing 6% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.02% epidermal growth factor (100 μg/ml; CytoLab, Rehovot, Israel), 2.8% hydrocortisone (50 μM; Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1% insulin (10 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), and 1% Pen/Strep (Gibco, UK). Human endothelial cells, Huvec were cultured in endothelial cell growth medium (cat. # C22011; Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) and used within 3 passages. Human primary mesenchymal stroma cells were prepared from thymus and cultured in DMEM/F12 (Rhenium) containing 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS). These cells were used within 5 passages.
Flow cytometry was performed with Beckton Dickenson machine and the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). It was used to monitor changes in the ploidy levels of malignant and normal cells. At the indicated times, the cells were collected, permeabilized (75% ethanol in double-distilled water), and stained with propidium iodide. Cell eradication and the kinetics of S-phase entry and G2/M transition were monitored by measuring the percentages of cells at the different phases. Cell counts at the selected time periods during 120 hours incubation indicated cell-cycle changes resulting from treatment with the tested compounds. Untreated cells were used as controls for each cell type at the selected time periods.
Confocal microscope imaging and immunocytochemistry
For immuno-cytochemistry, cells were grown on glass coverslips in the appropriate growth medium. After treatment, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; 20 minutes) and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X100 before blocking with 10% goat serum in PBS (details were described before ). The cells were immunolabeled for α and γ- tubulin. Spindles were labeled by antibodies directed against α-tubulin (T9026; Sigma) and detected by secondary fluorescent antibody Dylight (green) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Cat # 115-485-166). Antibodies directed against γ-tubulin (polyclonal, T5192; Sigma) detected by secondary fluorescent antibody CyTM3 (red) were used for immunolabeling of centrosomes. In some experiments centrosomes were double labeled for γ-tubulin (monoclonal, Abcam, MA, ab11316) and for centrin1 (polyclonal, Abcam, MA, ab11257) . The percentage of multi-focal spindles was calculated in most cases out of a total number of 20 spindles that were detected in different randomly selected scanned samples of each of the tested cell types.
For live confocal imaging of cells, cells were transfected using liposomal reagent (Jet-PI, Polyplus, #101-10) with vectors encoding for γ-tubulin-GFP (for detection of centrosomes), α-tubulin-RFP (for detection of spindles and microtubule arrays) and for histone H2B-RED (for detection of chromosomes). Twenty-four hours after transfection the cells were exposed to PJ-34 (20 μM) for 18 hours, and then incubated in the presence of PJ-34 in live imaging chamber and scanned over-night (about 15 hours) by confocal microscope imaging. All the vectors were a gift of Prof. Michael Brandeis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Luminescent detection of ATP level in the cells was used for quantification of cell viability. The Cell Viability Assay Kit (Abcam, MA) enabled a rapid quantification of viable cells in the cultures (the net result of growth arrest, cell death and cell proliferation). This method is based on the correlation between cell viability and ATP production, which signals the presence of metabolically active cells . High percentage of cell death, as quantified by flow cytometry, was in correlation with decreased ATP levels in the tested cell cultures.
We examined several potent PARP inhibitors, including the phenanthrene derivatives PJ-34, Tiq-A and Phen and the non-phenanthrene derivatives ABT-888 and BSI-201 (Figure 1) in human cancer cell types with a high occurrence of extra-centrosomal cells (>50%).
In our previous experiments PJ-34 caused G2/M arrest and a massive cell death in MDA-231 mammary cancer cells without impairing normal human mammary epithelial MCF-10 cells . Given that MDA-231 cells have high occurrence of extra-centrosomes, and the interference with bipolar clustering of supernumerary centrosomes causes G2/M arrest [5, 16, 17], we examined the possibility that PJ-34 affects extra-centrosomes clustering in mitosis.
These findings associated the remarkable cytotoxic activity of PJ-34 in MDA-231 cells with de-clustering of their extra-centrosomes in mitosis, causing multi-polar distorted spindles and aberrant chromosomes segregation that lead to 'mitotic catastrophe cell death' .
In contrast, non-phenanthrene derivatives acting as potent PARP inhibitors, BSI-201 and ABT888 [18, 19], did not share this capability. Even when used at high concentrations (2-4 times higher than concentrations completely inhibiting the activity of PARP-1) they did not impair the bifocal clustering of extra centrosomes in these cells (Figure 3).
To further test the suggested contribution of PJ-34 to extra-centrosomes de-clustering, we examined its activity in other human cancer cell-lines with high occurrence of supernumerary centrosomes.
Our results suggest that the exclusive eradication of human cancer cells with extra centrosomes by the phenanthridine derivative PJ-34 is attributable to its extra-centrosomes de-clustering activity in mitosis (Figures 2, 4, 5, 6, Additional File 1 and Additional File 2).
According to our observations, PJ-34 did not impair centrosomes in both human normal and cancer cells, nor did it interfere with the formation of centrosomes in the interphase of multi-centrosomal cancer cells or impaired the bi-polar assembly of centrosomes in mitosis of normal proliferating cells with two centrosomes (Figures 2a, 8, Additional File 1 and Additional File 2). These features may underlie its outstanding capability to exclusively eradicate human cancer cells while keeping normal proliferating cells un-affected (Figures 5 and 7).
Theoretically, in cancer cells with high occurrence of extra-centrosomes (>50%) when mitosis is accompanied by eradication of multi-centrosomal cells, an exponential reduction of the fraction of bi-centrosomal cancer cells is expected. In this case, the higher their proliferation rate the more rapidly will these cancer cells be eradicated by extra-centrosomes de-clustering agents.
The indicated interference of the tested phenanthrene derivatives with the bipolar clustering of supernumerary centrosomes was not shared by non-phenanthrene derivatives acting as potent PARP inhibitors as well (Figure 3). This questions an exclusive role of PARP inhibition in extra centrosomes de-clustering. Nevertheless, these results could also reflect a possible, yet un-identified selective inhibition of PARP isoforms by phenanthridines.
Results obtained from genome-wide RNAi screen in multi-centrosomal cells, including embryonic Drosophila S2 cells and human malignant cells, identified genes required to suppress multipolar mitosis. Proteins involved in the organization and regulation of the cytoskeleton, including Kinesin HSET/Ncd (which is not required for polar organization in normal somatic cells) and the four chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) components, Aurora-B, INCENP, Survivin, and Borealin were identified among the main proteins required for bifocal clustering of extra-centrosomes in these cells [12, 17]. Evidence for the necessity of tankyrase-I and a putative human PARP-16 homolog in centrosomes clustering has been also provided [17, 20]. PolyADP-ribosylation of tankyrase-1 may contribute to spindle bipolarity by providing a static matrix, anchoring microtubule-associated motor proteins and spindle proteins [17, 20]. A specific role for PARP-16 in mitosis has not been identified yet .
PARP proteins are present in centrosomes [21–24], and both Aurora-B and INCENP are targets for polyADP-ribosylation [22, 24]. In addition, supernumerary centrosomes were found in PARP-1 deficient cells . Thus, in view of the exclusive interference of PJ-34 with extra centrosomes de-clustering in mitosis, a possible synergism between PARP activity and other mechanisms underlying extra-centrosomes clustering should be further investigated.
The indicated cytotoxic activity of the phenanthrene derivatives in human cancer cells with high occurrence of extra-centrosomes links for the first time between two well known, but poorly understood phenomena; Some anti-tumor effects of natural phenanthridines were first described in the early fifties [26–28], and a higher cytotoxicity of some phenanthridines in cancer cells as compared to normal cells has been reported before [29, 30], although the underlying mechanisms have never been understood. In addition, cell-cycle arrest resulting from failure of centrosomes to accomplish bipolar clustering in multi-centrosomal cells has been acknowledged for nearly a century [6, 31, 32]. Nevertheless, the causal relationship between multiple centrosomes and malignancy has only recently been clarified [32–35].
Mitotic-spindle microtubules are among the most effective targets for anti-cancer therapy [5, 10, 17, 36–39]. Therefore efforts are invested in trying to find mechanisms exclusively targeting mitosis in cancer cells [40–42].
Unlike the exclusive interference of PJ-34 with extra centrosomes bi-polar clustering in mitosis (Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, Additional File 1 and Additional File 2), the currently known small molecules interfering with mitosis in cancer cells target microtubule polymerization (vinca alkaloids, taxanes, colchicines, and also griseofulvin). These compounds therefore impair normal cells as well, and cause severe side effects [36–39].
The discovered potency of PJ-34 in preventing bipolar clustering of extra centrosomes in mitosis may pave the way for a new efficient therapy lacking intolerable side effects, which is based on compounds that exclusively target the unique dependence of many human cancer cells on their supernumerary centrosomes clustering for their survival.
Since many human cancer cells have high occurrence of multicentrosomal cells, the exclusive cytotoxic activity of PJ-34 in multi-centrosomal human cancer cells holds promise as a therapeutic tool for a selective chemotherapy in a wide range of human cancers, beyond the currently used selective therapeutic tools targeting specific genes/proteins that affect few cancer cell types [43–45].
The identification of a molecule exclusively targeting the unique dependence of most human cancer cells on their supernumerary centrosomes bi-polar clustering for their survival, paves the way for a new highly selective cancer-targeting therapy, efficient in a wide range of human cancers.
This work was supported by the Feingrhot Karol and Leonora prize for cancer research (to M.C-A) and by the Israeli Science Foundation (to SI).
- Inbar-Rozensal D, Castiel A, Visochek L, Kastel D, Dantzer F, Izraeli S, Cohen-Armon M: A selective eradication of human nonhereditary breast cancer cells by phenanthridine-derived polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors. Breast Canc Res. 2009, 11/6/R78: 1-11.Google Scholar
- Chiarugi A, Meli E, Calvani M, Picca R, Picca R, Baronti R, Camaioni E, et al: Novel isoquinolinone-derived inhibitors of polyADP-ribose polymerase-1: Pharmacological characterization and neuroprotective effects in an in-vitro model of cerebral ischemia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003, 305: 943-949. 10.1124/jpet.103.048934.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jagtap P, Szabo C: Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase and the therapeutic effects of its inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2005, 4: 421-440. 10.1038/nrd1718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gergely F, Basto R: Multiple centrosomes: together they stand, divided they fall. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 2291-2296. 10.1101/gad.1715208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Godinho SA, Kwon M, Pellman D: Centrosomes and cancer: how cancer cells divide with too many cetrosomes. Canc Met Rev. 2009, 28: 85-98. 10.1007/s10555-008-9163-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doxsey S: Re-evaluating centrosome function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001, 2: 688-698. 10.1038/35089575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walczak CE, Heald R: Mechanisms of mitotic spindle assembly and function. International Rev of Cytology. 2008, (Elsevier Inc.), 265: 111-158.Google Scholar
- Bettencourt-Dias M, Glover D: Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understandings. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 8 (6): 451-463. doi:10.1038/nrm2180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cunha-Ferreira I, Bento I, Bettencourt-Dias M: From zero to many: control of centriole number in development and disease. Traffic. 2009, 10: 482-498. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00905.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galimberti F, Thompson SL, Ravi S, Compton D, Dmitrovsky E: Anaphase Catastrophe Is a Target for Cancer Therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 1218-1222. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1178.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tsou M-FB, Stearns T: Controlling centrosome number: licenses and blocks. Cur Opin Cell Biol. 2006, 18: 74-78. 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.12.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leber B, Maier B, Fuchs F, Chi J, Riffel P, Anderhub S, Wagner L, Ho AD, Salisbury JL, Boutros M, Krämer A: Proteins Required for Centrosome Clustering in Cancer Cells. Sci Transl Med. 2010, 2 (33): DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000915.
- Cohen-Armon M, Visochek L, Rozensal D, Kalal A, Geistrikh I, Klein R, Bendetz-Nezer S, Yao Z, Seger R: DNA-independent PARP-1 activation by phosphorylated ERK2 increases Elk1 activity: a link to histone acetylation. Mol Cell. 2007, 25: 297-308. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.12.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stearns T, Evans L, Kirschner M: γ-Tubulin is a highly conserved component of the centrosome. Cell. 1991, 65: 825-836. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90390-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vayssiere JL, Petit PX, Risler Y, Mignotte B: Commitment to apoptosis is associated with changes in mitochondrial biogenesis and activity in cell lines conditionally immortalized with simian virus 40. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 11752-11756. 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11752.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rieder CL, Maiato H: Stuck in Division or Passing through: What Happens When Cells Cannot Satisfy the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint. Dev Cell. 2004, 7: 637-651. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.09.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kwon M, Godinho SA, Chandhok NS, Ganem NJ, Azioune A, Thery M, Pellman D: Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 2189-2203. 10.1101/gad.1700908.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rouleau M, Patel A, Hendze MJ, Kaufmann SH, Poirier GG: PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond. Nature Rev Cancer. 2010, 10: 293-301. 10.1038/nrc2812.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krishnakumar R, Kraus WL: The PARP side of the nucleus: Molecular actions, physiological outcomes, and clinical targets. Mol Cell. 2010, 39: 8-24. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.017.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chang W, Dynek JN, Smith S: NuMA is a major acceptor of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by tankyrase 1 in mitosis. Biochem J. 2005, 391: 177-184. 10.1042/BJ20050885.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chang P, Jacobson MK, Mitchison TJ: PolyADP-ribose is required for spindle assembly and structure. Nature. 2004, 432: 645-649. 10.1038/nature03061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Earl E, Saxena A, MacDonald A, Hudson DF, Shaffer LG, et al: PolyADP-ribose polymers at active centromers and neocentromers at metaphase. Hum Mol Gen. 2000, 9: 187-194. 10.1093/hmg/9.2.187.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saxena A, Saffery R, Wong LH, Kalitsis P, Choo A: Centromere Proteins Cenpa, Cenpb, and Bub3 Interact with Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 Protein and Are Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 26921-26926. 10.1074/jbc.M200620200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanai M, Tong WM, Sugihara E, Wang ZQ, Fukasawa K, Miwa1 M: Involvement of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 and Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation in Regulation of Centrosome function. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 2451-2462. 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2451-2462.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ogino H, Nozaki T, Gunji A, Maeda M, Suzuki H, Ohta T, Murakami Y, Nakagama H, Sugimura T, Masutani M: Loss of Parp-1 affects gene expression profile in a genome-wide manner in ES cells and liver cells. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 41-10.1186/1471-2164-8-41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Coombs MM, Bhatt TS, Croft CJ: Correlation between carcinogenicity and chemical structure in Cyclopenta[α]- phenanthridines. Canc Res. 1973, 33: 832-837.Google Scholar
- Phillips SD, Castle RN: A review of the chemistry of the antitumor benzo-[c]phenanthridine alkaloids nitidine and fagaronine and of the related antitumor alkaloid coralyne. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry. 1981, 18: 223-232. 10.1002/jhet.5570180202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turchi G, Glatt HR, Seidel A, Puliti A, Sbrana I: Structure activity relationship in the induction of chromosomal aberrations and spindle disturbances in Chinese hamster epithelial liver cells by regioisomeric phenanthridine quinines. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 1997, 13: 155-165. 10.1023/A:1007302111081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamoral-Theys D, Andolfi A, Van Goietsenoven G, Cimmino A, Le Calve B, Wauthoz N: Lycorine, the main phenanthridine Amaryllidaceae alkaloid, exhibits significant antitumor activity in cancer cells that display resistance to proapoptotic stimuli: an investigation of structure-activity relationship and mechanistic insight. J Med Chem. 2009, 52: 6244-6256. 10.1021/jm901031h.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Iwasaki H, Okabe T, Takara K, Toda T, Shimatani M, Oku H: Tumor-selective cytotoxicity of benzo[c] phenanthridine derivatives from Toddalia asiatica Lam. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010, 65: 719-726. 10.1007/s00280-009-1077-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ingle WL, Salisbury JL: The role of the centrosomes in the development of malignant tumors. Current topics in Dev Biol. 1999, 49: 313-329.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ganem NJ, Godunov SA, Pellman D: A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature. 2009, 460: 278-282. 10.1038/nature08136.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fukasaw K: Oncogenes and tumour suppressors take in centrosomes. Nature Rev/Cancer. 2007, 7: 911-924. 10.1038/nrc2249.Google Scholar
- Fielding AB, Lim S, Montgomery K, Dobreva I, Dedhar S: critical role of integrin-linked kinase, ch-TOG and TACC3 in centrosome clustering in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2011, 30: 521-534. 10.1038/onc.2010.431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galimberti F, Thompson SL, Liu X, Li H, Memoli V, et al: Targeting the Cyclin E-Cdk-2 Complex Represses Lung Cancer Growth by Triggering Anaphase Catastrophe. Clin Canc Res. 2010, 16: 109-120. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jordan MA, Wilson L: Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004, 4: 253-265. 10.1038/nrc1317.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen JG, Horwitz SB: Differential mitotic responses to microtubule-stabilizing and de-stabilizing drugs. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 1935-1938.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rebacz B, Larsen TO, Clausen MH, Rønnest MH, Löffler H, Ho AD, Krämer A: Identification of Griseofulvin as an inhibitor of centrosomal clustering in a phenotype-based screen. Canc Res. 2007, 67: 6342-6350. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0663.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson JR, Denis R, Patrick DR, Mohammed M, Dar MM, Huang PS: Targeted anti-mitotic therapies: can we improve on tubulin agents?. Nature Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 107-117. 10.1038/nrc2049.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kozielski F, DeBonis S, Skoufias DA: Screening for inhibitors of microtubule-associated motor proteins. Methods Mol Med. 2007, 137: 189-207. 10.1007/978-1-59745-442-1_14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manning JA, Kuma S: A potential role for NEDD1 and the centrosome in senescence of mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2010, 1: e35-10.1038/cddis.2010.12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Riffell JL, Janicke RU, Roberge M: Caspase-3-Dependent Mitotic Checkpoint Inactivation by the Small-Molecule Inducers of Mitotic Slippage SU6656 and Geraldol. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011, 10: 839-849. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0909.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, et al: Mutations of the B-RAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002, 417: 949-954. 10.1038/nature00766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bild AH, Potti A, Nevins JR: Linking oncogenic pathways with therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 734-741.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O'Connor MJ, Martin NM, Smith GC: Targeted cancer therapies based on the inhibition of DNA strand break repair. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 7816-7824. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/412/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.