p-Glycoprotein ABCB5 and YB-1 expression plays a role in increased heterogeneity of breast cancer cells: correlations with cell fusion and doxorubicin resistance
© Yang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 December 2009
Accepted: 22 July 2010
Published: 22 July 2010
Cancer cells recurrently develop into acquired resistance to the administered drugs. The iatrogenic mechanisms of induced chemotherapy-resistance remain elusive and the degree of drug resistance did not exclusively correlate with reductions of drug accumulation, suggesting that drug resistance may involve additional mechanisms. Our aim is to define the potential targets, that makes drug-sensitive MCF-7 breast cancer cells turn to drug-resistant, for the anti-cancer drug development against drug resistant breast cancer cells.
Doxorubicin resistant human breast MCF-7 clones were generated. The doxorubicin-induced cell fusion events were examined. Heterokaryons were identified and sorted by FACS. In the development of doxorubicin resistance, cell-fusion associated genes, from the previous results of microarray, were verified using dot blot array and quantitative RT-PCR. The doxorubicin-induced expression patterns of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes were validated.
YB-1 and ABCB5 were up regulated in the doxorubicin treated MCF-7 cells that resulted in certain degree of genomic instability that accompanied by the drug resistance phenotype. Cell fusion increased diversity within the cell population and doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 cells emerged probably through clonal selection. Most of the drug resistant hybrid cells were anchorage independent. But some of the anchorage dependent MCF-7 cells exhibited several unique morphological appearances suggesting minor population of the fused cells maybe de-differentiated and have progenitor cell like characteristics.
Our work provides valuable insight into the drug induced cell fusion event and outcome, and suggests YB-1, GST, ABCB5 and ERK3 could be potential targets for the anti-cancer drug development against drug resistant breast cancer cells. Especially, the ERK-3 serine/threonine kinase is specifically up-regulated in the resistant cells and known to be susceptible to synthetic antagonists.
The prognosis of breast cancer patients is closely associated with the response of the tumor cells to chemotherapy. Doxorubicin is one of the primary chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of breast cancer [1, 2]. Various tumors initially respond to administered drugs, however, once the cancer cells could gain resistance during anticancer drug treatment, there are only a few treatment options [3, 4]. Resistance to chemotherapy is believed to cause treatment failure in over 90% of the patients with metastatic cancer [5, 6]. Multidrug resistant cancer cells are thought to be derived from emerging clones within primary tumors  and all multidrug resistances were found to be closely related with additional changes to the already altered copy number profile of the breast tumors [8, 9]. Up to now, the iatrogenic mechanisms of induced chemotherapy-resistance and the question of whether cells with drug resistance potential are frequent or atypical within human cancers remain mainly elusive.
Interestingly, cancer cells were known to fuse with many cell types in vivo, including stromal cells and endothelial cells [10, 11]. Cell fusion was reported to account for the plasticity of adult stem cells in vivo , while an accidental heterotypic cell fusion was noted to build tetraploid cells that may lead to initiation and progression of neoplastic tumor through genomic instability . However, the mechanism of action of doxorubicin appears to be complex and unclear, moreover, doxorubicin was known to interact directly with tumor cell membrane proteins.
Recently, Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) was reported as a stronger predictor, of all breast tumor subtypes specific survival, than estrogen receptor or HER-2 . The locus of YB-1 gene is on 1p34 and 80% of primary breast tumors show increased copy numbers of chromosome 1 . When cells are under the cytotoxic stimuli of anti-cancer drugs, the stress-responsive protein YB-1 is known to be translocated to the nuclei , YB-1 functions as a transcription factor for the expression of the well known membrane efflux pump, the multiple drug resistance gene I (MDR1/ABCB1) that allows anti-cancer drug resistance .
Recently, however, the resistance mechanisms are revealed as multifactorial and no single protein expression is solely responsible for acquired multiple drug resistance [18–21]. Amino acid sequence of p-Glycoprotein ABCB5 was reported highly homologous to both of the known human P-gp isoforms ABCB1 (MDR1) and ABCB4 (MDR3), and new evidence has suggested that ABCB5 could mediate cell to cell fusion . On the basis of this rationale and with our preliminary results from microarray analysis on cell fusion (data not shown), we postulated that cell fusion could be an essential prerequisite event prior to diversified MCF-7 subpopulations emerging.
Therefore, the goals of the present study were, firstly, to investigate whether the overexpression of YB-1 could induce cell fusion on doxorubicin treatment, secondly, to scrutinize whether this cell fusion event could increase genetically diversified cell population, and finally, to define the potential targets of pro-survival gene products and pro-apoptotic ones (that makes drug-sensitive MCF-7 breast cancer cells turn to drug-resistance).
Cell culture and drug selection
Creation of GFP-YB-1 and DsRed-YB-1 expressing MCF-7 cell lines
The human YB-1 coding sequence (containing 1.4 kb YB-1) was amplified from pCMV-SPORT6/YB-1 (a generous gift from Yun-Sik Yang, Genome Research Center for Immune Disorders, Wonkwang University) and inserted into EcoRV /Xho1 of multiple cloning site (MCS) of a pcDNA3-EGFP vector (6.2 kb) and into EcoR1 and Apa1 of a pDsRed2-N1 vector (4.7 kb, BD Clontech). The vectors, pcDNA3-EGFP/YB-1 and pDsRed2-N1/YB-1 (having the initiator ATG codon of YB-1), direct expressions of fusion proteins, GFP-YB-1 and DsRed-YB-1, respectively under CMV promoter in MCF-7 cells. For that purpose, 1 × 105 MCF-7 cells were grown on a 6-well plate for 24 h and the expression constructs were transfected into doxorubicin sensitive MCF-7 cells according to the manufacturer's instructions (FuGENE 6, Roche). 48 h after transfection, G418 (500 μg/ml, Duchefa) was added for the selection of the stably transfected cells and continued for 2 weeks. The efficiency of the transfection was evaluated 22 hours after transfection by observing the green GFP and red DsRed fluorescence in the transfected cells using an Axiovert 200 fluorescent microscope (Zeiss), the images captured using a digital camera (AxioCam MRm) and visualized and documented using the AxioVision Rel 4.6 software.
Dot blot array assay analysis
Based on the knowledge gained from the microarray assay (data not shown) on cell fusion, custom made dot blot arrays were employed to verify whether the up-regulated genes on fused cell hybrids are biologically relevant in the development of doxorubicin resistance. The methods of array assay were adopted from the Atlas Select Human Tumor Array (Clontech, PT1117-1, PT3399-1) with modifications. The gene specific primers were designed with MacVector software (International Biotechnologies) employing a sequence data base. The primers were as follows: YB-1 forward, 5'-tcgcagtgtaggagatggagagact-3'; YB-1 reverse, 5'-cggtaccgacgttgaggtggct-3'; c-Kit forward, 5'-ggcgcgagggaggggaggcgagga-3'; c-Kit reverse, 5'-aagtgcagcgagcgcggcaaagcc-3'; MAPT forward, 5'-cccaacactcctcagaacgaacttatcc-3'; MAPT reverse, 5'-gccatcctggttcaaagttca-3'; GST forward, 5'-ttggccatgacgcgggttgt-3'; GST reverse, 5'-agttgggcacagaaacaaatcttgga-3'; GM-CSF2RA forward, 5'-agatctgacagcctgaaccctcct-3'; GM-CSF2RA reverse, 5'-gtgtcgcggaggcggagatg-3'; 15-LOX-1 forward, 5'-ggctcgggaccaggtttgcc-3'; 15-LOX-1 reverse, 5'-gtggcttgggtgatgggggc-3'; CypB forward, 5'-gagggcatggaggtggtgcg-3'; CypB reverse, 5'-gccagtgcagctcagagccc-3'; LCN2 forward, 5'-tcccagccccacctctgagc-3'; LCN2 reverse, 5'-atggtgttcgggctggtgcg-3'; GRP78 forward, 5'-aagcgccgcggcctgtattt-3'; GRP78 reverse, 5'-acgccgacgcaggagtaggt-3'; RSK1 forward, 5'-cgtccactgggaccaactgcc-3'; RSK1 reverse, 5'-agcagcagcaggaacagcagc-3'; COX2 forward, 5'-ccaggcgacctgcgactcct-3'; COX2 reverse, 5'- accgtagtatacccccggtcgtg-3'; CRABP2 forward, 5'-tgctcaaagtgctgggggtga-3'; CRABP2 reverse; 5'-gcgcacggtggtggaggttt-3'; Gapdh forward, 5'-ccaaacgggtcatcatctc-3'; Gapdh reverse, 5'-tggatgcagggatgatgtt-3'; β-actin forward, 5'-cctggcacccagcacaat-3' and β-actin reverse, 5'-gccgatccacacggagtact-3'. For the cDNA amplification of target genes, template was generated from polyA+-RNA or genomic DNA of MCF-7 cells that were serially diluted to give an optimal concentration for PCR. The subsequent PCR products were evaluated by gel electrophoresis on 1~2% agarose gels and confirmed a single PCR product of the predicted size. Each 100 pmol of 14 cDNA products were spotted onto nylon membranes (Hybond-N+, Amersham) with QArray systems (Genetix) in duplicates to eliminate potential non-specific single spot hybridization. On the other hand, total RNA was recovered with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) followed by isopropanol precipitation and ethanol washing from the each of doxorubicin sensitive MCF-7 cells (5 × 106), after 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h of incubation with 20 nM doxorubicin. Second purification was done by RNeasy Protect Mini kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer's protocol. For cDNA labeling, total RNA was converted into α-32P-labeled first strand cDNA with gene-specific primer cocktails. After hybridization, the membrane was quickly washed, then exposed to a phosphor imaging plate (Molecular Dynamics) for three to five days. ImageQuant version 1.2 (Molecular Dynamics) was used for visualization and spot finding, spot quantification. The house keeping genes (Actin, GAPDH) were employed for normalization. For background subtraction and normalization, the Excel (Microsoft) program was used. Spots below threshold intensity were eliminated and the expression ratio data were median-centered.
Total RNA (150 μg) was extracted from each of the non-fused and fused MCF-7 cells (R2, FACS sorted) and assayed with a Human Sentrix-6 V3 BeadChip that containing 48,803 human genes (Illumina, GenoCheck, Korea).
In order to analyse the cell to cell fusion of the stably strasfected cells (with pcDNA3-EGFP/YB-1 and pDsRed2-N1/YB-1), the two transfectants were mixed (1 to 1 ratio) and co-cultured with or without 10 nmol/L doxorubicin for 6 days and 1 × 107/ml cells were resuspended in (1×) PBS for immediate analysis or in (1×) PBS containing 5% FBS for cell sorting. Fluorescence was detected using a MoFlow flow cytometer/cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed using Summit 5.1 software. Dead cells were gated out first and hetertypically fused cells gated and sorted based on merged fluorescence of GFP and DsRed.
Western blot analysis
The same numbers of MCF-7 cells (5 × 107) were lysed using 150 μl RIPA buffer with freshly added protease inhibitors, then transferred to an Eppendorf microcentrifuge tube and mixed by inversion for 30 m at 4°C and centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 30 m. The supernatant was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube, the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method. The protein extracts were electrophoresed by 12% SDS-PAGE, then electrically transferred onto nitrocellulose filters and probed with the following primary antibodies (specific to the proteins that may associated with acquired drug resistance): YB-1 (dilution factor 1:200, Cell Signalling), c-Kit (1:1000, Cell Signalling); ERK1/2 (1: 1000, Cell Signalling); ERK3 (1: 500, Novus Biologicals); FAS (1: 500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); MAPT (1: 1500, Proteintech Group); and MDR1 (1: 500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), ABCB5 (1: 2000, ProSci); PARP-1 (1: 2000, Trevigen); β-Actin (1:5000, Sigma) was used as a loading control. The membranes were rinsed with Tris-buffered saline, treated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was applied for 1 h at 1:2000 dilution. After four washes in PBST, blots were treated with ECL-plus (Amersham Pharmacia) according to the manufacture's specification, and exposed to Biomax ML film (Kodak) to detect the protein bands. The intensity of the band derived from each sample was measured by AlphaImager® HP densitometer.
Increased genomic instability of MCF-7 cells during single-step low dose doxorubicin selection
Figure 1A and 1C shows percentage vitality of MCF-7 cells. The dose-effect of doxorubicin (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 1000 nM) on cellular growth rate of MCF-7 was observed over the period of two weeks. Our proximal 50% growth inhibition (IC50) of doxorubicin for parental MCF-7 cells was 68 nM and for one of the pre-selected doxorubicin resistant clones was 120 nM. 10-20 nM doxorubicin was employed based on the previously known reports [23, 24]. To examine the time-dependent effect of doxorubicin on cell proliferation, ~1000 cells were then incubated with 10 nM doxorubicin for 15 days, and further extended up to 8 weeks. Compared to the doxorubicin-non treated cells, the death rate of doxorubicin-treated cells was gradually reduced up to day 9, and eventually the cell growth rate exceeded the control at day 12 (Figure 1B). However, an abnormally high proliferation was not observed that accounts for a typical aggressive tumor mass. The idea behind the clonal evolution model is that neoplasms continue to divide and fail to die until they are well adapted. Therefore, a shorter doubling time would not necessarily confer an additional survival advantage, especially in the development of acquiring drug resistance. The ratio of MCF-7 cells with the multiple nuclei is significantly increased, before doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 clones emerged, compared to the drug sensitive control MCF-7 cells. This indicates that certain degree of genomic instability is accompanied by the drug resistance phenotype after a single low dose exposure to cancer cells over the certain period of time. The doxorubicin-induced cell fusion events were further examined using two MCF-7 transfectants having pcDNA3-EGFP/YB-1 or pDsRed2-N1/YB-1.
Doxorubicin-induced homotypic and heterotypic cell fusion
Heterogeneity of MCF-7 cell populations after acquiring the drug resistance
Induced expression of cell-fusion associated genes after doxorubicin treatment
Based on the results of Sentrix Human-6-V3 Expression Bead Chips on cell fusion (Additional file 1, Table S1) and literature review, we analyzed the expression patterns of the following genes (YB-1, c-Kit, MAPT, GST, GM-CSF2RA, 15-LOX-1, CypB, LCN2, GRP78, RSK1, COX2, and CRABP2 including controls Actin, GAPDH and guide dots), using custom made dot blot array containing 14 cDNA spots. In the time course study, GAPDH could not be acceptable for normalization because it was regulated in doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 cells. In the pre-chemotherapeutic (doxorubicin sensitive) MCF-7 cells, total 4 genes (YB-1, c-Kit, MAPT, GST) out of 14 were differentially expressed at specific time points after doxorubicin-treatment (Figure 5A). The results were further verified by RT-PCR analysis and the expression patterns of 4 genes, in time course, were similar with the results of dot blot array analysis (data not shown). Genes such as YB-1 and GST revealed transient and inducible kinetics whose level peaked at 6 h and 4 h, respectively in the doxorubicin-sensitive MCF-7 cells. GST was known to detoxify several chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, the shift of over-expression of GST, from 4 h to 24 h in the doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 cells (Figure 5B), might be a result of the counter-apoptotic exertion by resisting to oxidative stress-mediated cytotoxicity of doxorubicin . Meanwhile, levels of c-Kit and MAPT were also up-regulated after doxorubicin treatment but with different kinetics from that of YB-1 and GST.
Expression analysis of drug resistance-related proteins
To investigate whether and how the pro-survival (c-Kit, ERK1/2, ERK3, MAPT, MDR1, ABCB5) and pro-apoptotic genes (FAS and PARP-1) are involved in doxorubicin-induced molecular events (Figure 5C), we examined their expression patterns in each subtype of MCF-7 cells (MCF-7, MCF-7/YB-1, MCF-7/YB-1 not fused, MCF-7/YB-1 fused, and doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 cells). Cells were treated with doxorubicin for 6 h and probed with antibodies against YB-1, c-Kit, ERK1/2, ERK3, FAS, MAPT, MDR1, ABCB5 and PARP-1. YB-1, c-Kit and MDR-1 was noticeably expressed following the drug treatment. However, the expression of FAS and PARP-1 was not detected in the pre-selected doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 cells even after doxorubicin treatment, suggesting that these cells are resistant to drug-induced apoptosis. Of note, ABCB5 expression was induced upon drug treatment in the drug sensitive cells (regardless of non-fused and fused cells), and ABCB5 expression was not induced in the drug untreated sensitive MCF-7 cells and in the pre-selected doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 cells (Figure 5C). Additional efforts are needed to adequately address this disparity. A specific role of ABCB5 in cell fusion, through membrane potential regulation, was reported . If it is the case that the transcription factor YB-1 regulates ABCB5, doxorubicin treatment may correlate with cell fusion, however, further study is needed.
Most of the long term cultured drug resistant cells (fused hybrid, R2), that isolated from the parental MCF-7 cells, were anchorage independent. But some of the anchorage dependent MCF-7 cells exhibited several unique morphological appearances (data not shown). The studies on copy number variation, between non-fused and fused MCF-7 cells, are underway to further define the correlations between the increased genomic instability (by cell fusion) and drug resistance.
Transient neoplastic tumor cells frequently have mass chromosomal alterations, rather than several dozen genetic mutations which eventually lead to drug resistance . During the generation of doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 clones, we observed the presence of multiple nuclei, in the enlarged cytoplasm of cells. The event of nucleus redistribution of the multi-nuclear cells is triggered by cell fusion or by mitotic failure  that accounts for the plasticity of adult stem cells in vivo . The cell to cell fusion is a newly recognized phenomenon thought to contribute to drug resistance potential. However, molecular mechanisms governing cell fusion are unknown yet. YB-1 was mostly localized to the nucleus rather than to the cytoplasm in the doxorubicin treated doxorubicin-sensitive MCF-7/YB-1 cells. Multi-nucleated cells were generated later through cytosolic cell fusion or some cells further went through nuclear fusion.
Both control and doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 cells did not noticeably generate fused cells when cultured in drug free condition, suggesting MCF-7 cells with doxorubicin-resistant potential are initiated from the drug induced cell fusion.
YB-1 is frequently expressed in breast cancers [28, 29]. When YB-1 is overexpressed in the mammary gland of transgenic mice, breast tumors develop in all of mice . In the initial diagnosis, breast cancers were known to consist of multiple subpopulations of cells with the characteristics of chromosome aberrations . Up to now, there has been no clear explanation on how this diversity comes out and how it is re-arranged in breast cancers. Multi-nucleated cells were generated in doxorubicin treated MCF-7/YB-1 cells (doxorubicin sensitive). When two cells were fused, daughter cells inherited characteristics of heterokaryons or of synkaryons. The heterokaryotic nuclear fusion (0.11%) of two MCF-7 subtypes was identified and quantified by flow cytometry. Figure 4C demonstrates a critical role for YB-1 in MCF-7 cell fusion. Among the doxorubicin treated drug sensitive MCF-7 cells, fused cells (syncytia) have multiple nuclei within a large cytoplasm, and 66% among FACS sorted R2 cells were mainly polyploidy. Some chromosomes were eventually lost or re-arranged in these polyploidy MCF-7 cells, which resulted in the development of doxorubicin resistance. Therefore, drug-resistance might be a severe secondary disease occurring after a series of alterations in chromosome structure and number . Over a century ago, aneuploidy was found in human cancers describing that the abnormal chromosome number is a cause of cancer rather than an end result .
Chromosome instability is believed to be responsible for the genome-wide changes of transient stages between early tumorigenesis and subsequent occurrence of aggressive tumor phenotypes [32, 33]. Among these small subpopulations of MCF-7 cells, a few cells became resistant to doxorubicin, after an initial response (acquired resistance). However, the reason that some tumor cells are inherently resistant (intrinsic resistance) without previous drug treatment is not known yet. If anti-cancer drug resistant cells represent marginal populations, the present chemotherapeutic treatment should be concentrated on this minor cell population rather than the impending large population of non-drug resistant cells. Further more, spontaneously occurring cell fusion without doxorubicin treatment may suggest a correlation with intrinsic drug resistance.
The overexpression of P-Glycoprotein was closely associated with multi-drug resistance . Recently, the amino acid sequence and protein structure of p-Glycoprotein ABCB5 was reported  and the sequence of ABCB5 is highly homologous (73%) to both of the known human p-Glycoprotein isoforms ABCB1 (MDR1) and ABCB4 (MDR3). We were interested in third member of the human P-Glycoprotein family ABCB5 (MDR3), because ABCB5 was known to be a determinant of membrane potential and a possible regulator of cell fusion in a defined progenitor subpopulation . Moreover, in the development of drug resistance, the correlation between nuclear YB-1 expression and P-Glycoprotein ABCB5 has never been demonstrated. We sought to further confirm the role of ABCB5 in the correlation of pro-survival genes (c-Kit, ERK1/2, ERK3, MAPT and MDR1) with pro-apoptotic gene products (FAS and PARP-1) in YB-1 mediated stimulation by doxorubicin. There have been controversial studies describing fused cells were not tumorigenic , until more conclusive data were available describing that hybrids become tumorigenic if they lose certain chromosomes . YB-1 and GST revealed different kinetic patterns on doxorubicin sensitive MCF-7 from those on doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 cells. On doxorubicin treatment, each peak of the expression levels of YB-1 and GST were shifted to 2 h and 24 h, respectively in the doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 cells. The turn of YB-1 into earlier response was correlated with nuclear localization of YB-1 that regulates the expression of anti-apoptotic genes. Moreover, the shift of GST expression from 4 h to 24 h was associated with reduced apoptosis, and that may due to detoxification by GST . In this context, survival functions seemed strengthened by the suppressed expression of pro-apoptotic FAS and PARP-1 proteins in doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 clones. Upon drug treatment, YB-1, c-Kit, and MDR1 were all up-regulated compared to doxorubicin non-treated cells. Akt activation was suggested to regulate the nuclear translocation of transcription factor YB-1, affecting the expression of MDR1. A novel finding of our study is the demonstration that c-Kit is co-expressed with ERK3 among drug resistant MCF-7 subpopulations. On the other hand, P-Glycoprotein ABCB5 was highly expressed only in the fused MCF-7 cells (R2) while preferentially suppressed in the doxorubicin resistant cells. However, further experiments are necessary to confirm whether ABCB5 is mediated by the expression of YB-1. Ectopically expressed ABCB5 are known to mediate the hyper-polarization of the membrane potential . Other studies illustrated depolarizing the cell line P388 increased the doxorubicin uptake in the sensitive cells but not in the resistant cells . More recently, the association between hyperpolarization of membrane and cell fusion was demonstrated . Taken as a whole, ABCB5 may not directly potentiate doxorubicin resistance, but responsible for increasing heterogeneity in the cancer cell population. In the doxorubicin resistant cells, the intensity of ERK3 band was 2.6-fold increased than that of fused cells. Despite the fact that ERK3 is about 50% identical to ERK1 and ERK2 in its catalytic core , key properties of ERK3 is different from the two classical MAPKs. Like YB-1, ERK3 also translocates to the nucleus, upon phosphorylation by MEKs, then ERK3 is constitutively localized to the nucleus . In contrast to ERK1 and ERK 2, the regulation of ERK3 expression is independent of the p53, Bcl-2 and caspase 3, but dependent of p38 pathway activation . Furthermore, the ERK-3 is known to be susceptible to synthetic antagonists.
Our results of current study indicate only a small subpopulation of fused cells obtain acquired resistance, subsequently became stable cell lines having viability against doxorubicin. Therefore, alterations of epigenetic regulation could be another factor that contributes to tumor cell diversity .
Through cell fusion, a genome causing drug resistance possibly gets a chance of cellular reprogramming to hide from chemotherapy and re-emerge as a new type of drug resistant cancer after the first targeted cancer cells were eliminated by the therapy. As suggested by other study, the recurred cancers are new hybrid species which might have evolved from their parental cells . The doxorubicin resistant-fused hybrid cells were mostly anchorage-independent and a rare population of the anchorage-dependent MCF-7 cells exhibited differentiated-progenitor cell-like behavior, suggesting that acquired doxorubicin resistant cells may be originated from the fused cells, but additional studies should address this possibility. Due to the complexity of its randomness of acquisition or loss of genetic traits, we can not explain yet how the fate or plasticity of cancer cells is exactly affected by the cell fusion procedure.
During the generation of doxorubicin resistant MCF-7 clones, multiple nuclei were detected in MCF-7 cells. Exogenously expressed YB-1 was mostly localized to the nucleus rather than to the cytoplasm in the doxorubicin treated doxorubicin-sensitive MCF-7/YB-1 cells. We confirmed the multi-nuclear cells were originated from cell fusion that accompanied by regulation of YB-1, GST, ABCB5 and ERK3. Unlike in ovarian cancer, breast cancer is composed of more diversified subpopulation of cells suggesting stem cell like cells may exist. Cell fusion increased diversity within the MCF-7 cell population and some of the fused cells exhibited progenitor cell like characteristics. Drug resistance could not be explained only by reductions of drug accumulation. The present study shows a correlation between doxorubicin induced transcription factor YB-1 and the transiently regulated fusogenic factor ABCB5 , suggesting cell fusion and clonal selection may involve as an additional mechanism in the progress of acquired drug resistance in MCF-7 cells. By understanding the mechanism of drug resistance and discovering novel targets for pharmacological, molecular, and genetic intervention, it may become possible to increase the usefulness of existing anti-cancer drugs.
Y-box binding protein-1
Glutathione S Transferase
ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B member 5
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 3.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant Number: 2009-0073822).
- Jasmin C, Gil-Delgado MA, Marino JP, Ecstein E, Descorps-Declere A, Misset JL: Phase I-II constant infusion of adriamycin (doxorubicin) by ambulatory pump delivery system in heavily pretreated (including adriamycin) breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 1990, 1: 189-193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- White SC, Lorigan P, Middleton MR, Anderson H, Valle J, Summers Y, Burt PA, Arance A, Stout R, Thatcher N: Randomized phase II study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine compared with single-agent carboplatin in patients with poor prognosis small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2001, 92: 601-608. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<601::AID-CNCR1360>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kruh GD: Introduction to resistance to anticancer agents. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 7262-7264. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Driscoll L, Clynes M: Molecular markers of multiple drug resistance in breast cancer. Chemotherapy. 2006, 52: 125-129. 10.1159/000092540.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clarke R, Dickson RB, Brünner N: The process of malignant progression in human breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 1990, 1: 401-407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coley HM: Mechanisms and consequences of chemotherapy resistance in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 3-7. Supplements 7
- Langley RR, Fidler IJ: Tumor cell-organ microenvironment interactions in the pathogenesis of cancer metastasis. Endocr Rev. 2007, 28: 297-321. 10.1210/er.2006-0027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Struckhoff AP, Bittman R, Burow ME, Clejan S, Elliott S, Hammond T, Tang Y, Beckman BS: Novel ceramide analogs as potential chemotherapeutic agents in breast cancer. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004, 309: 523-532. 10.1124/jpet.103.062760.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duesberg P, Li R, Sachs R, Fabarius A, Upender MB, Hehlmann R: Cancer drug resistance: The central role of the karyotype. Drug Resist Update. 2007, 10: 51-58. 10.1016/j.drup.2007.02.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsen BM, Harrell JC, Jedlicka P, Borges VF, Varella-Garcia M, Horwitz KB: Spontaneous fusion with, and transformation of mouse stroma by, malignant human breast cancer epithelium. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 8274-8279. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjerregaard B, Holck S, Christensen IJ, Larsson LI: Syncytin is involved in breast cancer endothelial cell fusions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006, 63: 1906-1911. 10.1007/s00018-006-6201-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pochampally RR, Neville BT, Schwarz EJ, Li MM, Prockop DJ: Rat adult stem cells (marrow stromal cells) engraft and differentiate in chick embryos without evidence of cell fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9282-9285. 10.1073/pnas.0401558101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ogle BM, Cascalho M, Platt JL: Biological implications of cell fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 6: 567-575. 10.1038/nrm1678.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Habibi G, Leung S, Law JH, Gelmon K, Masoudi H, Turbin D, Pollak M, Nielsen TO, Huntsman D, Dunn SE: Redefining prognostic factors for breast cancer: YB-1 is a stronger predictor of relapse and disease-specific survival than estrogen receptor or HER-2 across all tumor subtypes. Breast Cancer Res. 2008, 10: R86-10.1186/bcr2156.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bergmann S, Royer-Pokora B, Fietze E, Jürchott K, Hildebrandt B, Trost D, Leenders F, Claude JC, Theuring F, Bargou R, Dietel M, Royer HD: YB-1 provokes breast cancer through the induction of chromosomal instability that emerges from mitotic failure and centrosome amplification. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 4078-4087. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohno K, Sato S, Uchiumi T, Takano H, Kato S, Kuwano M: Tissue-specific enhancer of the human multidrug-resistance (MDR 1) gene. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 19690-19696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen Y, Simon SM: In situ biochemical demonstration that p-Glycoprotein is a drug efflux pump with broad specificity. J Cell Biol. 2000, 148: 863-870. 10.1083/jcb.148.5.863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grant R, James W: Ironside glutathione S-transferases and cytochrome P450 detoxifying enzyme distribution in human cerebral glioma. J Neurooncol. 1995, 25: 1-7. 10.1007/BF01054717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bart J, Hollema H, Groen HJ, de Vries EG, Hendrikse NH, Sleijfer DT, Wegman TD, Vaalburg W, van der Graaf WT: The distribution of drug-efflux pumps, P-gp, BCRP, MRP1 and MRP2, in the normal blood-testis barrier and in primary testicular tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2004, 40: 2064-2070. 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradbury PA, Middleton MR: DNA repair pathways in drug resistance in melanoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2004, 15: 421-426. 10.1097/01.cad.0000127665.74096.93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim IJ, Bae YT, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Kim DS, Lee JS: Determination and prediction of p-glycoprotein and multidrug-resistance-related protein expression in breast cancer with double-phase technetium-99 m sestamibi scintimammography. Oncology. 2006, 70: 403-410. 10.1159/000098812.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frank NY, Pendse SS, Lapchak PH, Margaryan A, Shlain D, Doeing C, Sayegh MH, Frank MH: Regulation of progenitor cell fusion by ABCB5 P-glycoprotein, a novel human ATP-binding cassette transporter. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 47156-47165. 10.1074/jbc.M308700200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Järvinen TA, Tanner M, Rantanen V, Bärlund M, Borg A, Grénman S, Isola J: Amplification and deletion of topoisomerase IIα associate with ErbB-2 amplification and affect sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 2000, 156: 839-847.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hembruff SL, Laberge ML, Villeneuve DJ, Guo B, Veitch Z, Cecchetto M, Parissenti AM: Role of drug transporters and drug accumulation in the temporal acquisition of drug resistance. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 318-10.1186/1471-2407-8-318.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yahata H, Kobayashi H, Kamura T, Amada S, Hirakawa T, Kohno K, Kuwano M, Nakano H: Increased nuclear localization of transcription factor YB-1 in acquired cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2002, 128: 621-626. 10.1007/s00432-002-0386-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bjerkvig R, Tysnes BB, Aboody KS, Najbauer J, Terzis AJA: The origin of the cancer stem cell: current controversies and new insights. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 899-904. 10.1038/nrc1740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller I, Jenner A, Bruchelt G, Niethammer D, Halliwell B: Effect of concentration on the cytotoxic mechanism of doxorubicin-apoptosis and oxidative DNA damage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 230: 2254-2257. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.5898.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Lee C, Yokom D: Disruption of the Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) results in suppression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and Her-2. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 4872-4879. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3561.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stratford AL, Habibi G, Astanehe A, Jiang H, Hu K, Park E, Shadeo A, Buys TP, Lam W, Pugh T, Marra M, Nielsen TO, Klinge U, Mertens PR, Aparicio S, Dunn SE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is transcriptionally induced by the Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) and can be inhibited with Iressa in basal-like breast cancer providing a potential target for therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2007, 9: R61-10.1186/bcr1767.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Persson K, Pandis N, Mertens F, Borg A, Baldetorp B, Killander D, Isola J: Chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer: a comparison between cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization. Gene Chromosome Canc. 1999, 25: 115-122. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199906)25:2<115::AID-GCC7>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boveri T: Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris. J Cell Sci. 2008, 121 (Suppl 1): 1-84. 10.1242/jcs.025742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loeb KR, Loeb LA: Genetic instability and the mutator phenotype studies in ulcerative colitis. Am J Pathol. 1999, 154: 1621-1626.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gollin SM: Chromosomal instability. Curr Opin Oncol. 2004, 16: 25-31. 10.1097/00001622-200401000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gerlach JH, Bell DR, Karakousis C, Slocum HK, Kartner N, Rustum YM, Ling V, Baker RM: P-glycoprotein in human sarcoma: evidence for multidrug resistance. J Clin Oncol. 1987, 5: 1452-1460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giguère L, Morals R: On suppression of tumorigenicity in hybrid and cybrid mouse cells. Somat Cell Genet. 1981, 7: 457-471. 10.1007/BF01542990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duelli D, Lazebnik Y: Cell fusion: A hidden enemy?. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 445-448. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00114-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Zhou P, Craig RW, Lu L: Protection from cell death by mcl-1 is mediated by membrane hyperpolarization induced by K(+) channel activation. J Membr Biol. 1999, 172: 113-120. 10.1007/s002329900589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bose R, Lam HYP: Membrane transport changes in an adriamycin-resistant murine leukemia cell line and in its sensitive parental cell line. Cancer Chemoth Pharm. 1988, 21: 14-18. 10.1007/BF00262731.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho HC, Kashiwakura Y, Marbán E: Creation of a biological pacemaker by cell fusion. Circ Res. 2007, 100: 1112-1115. 10.1161/01.RES.0000265845.04439.78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson MJ, Xu Be BE, Stippec S, Cobb MH: Different domains of the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK3 and ERK2 direct subcellular localization and upstream specificity in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 5094-5100. 10.1074/jbc.M110935200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khokhlatchev AV, Canagarajah B, Wilsbacher J, Robinson M, Atkinson M, Goldsmith E, Cobb MH: Phosphorylation of the MAP Kinase ERK2 promotes its homodimerization and nuclear translocation. Cell. 1998, 93: 605-615. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81189-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kikyo N, Wolffe AP: Reprogramming nuclei: insights from cloning, nuclear transfer and heterokaryons. J Cell Sci. 2000, 113: 11-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pawelek JM: Tumor cell fusion as a source of myeloid traits in cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005, 6: 988-993. 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70466-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/388/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.