Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the included clinical studies

From: Long-term survival after neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer under different treatment regimens: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Study ID

Auther-year

Journal

Masking

RCT

Arms

Medicine

Clinical stage

TNBC definition

Endpoints

Total numbers

pCR (%)

HR for DFS

P value

HR for OS

P value

NATT trial

Xiaosong Chen-2013

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Open-label

RCT

2

TAC vs TC

IIB—IIIC

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

DFS

OS

26

15.40%

DFS

0.33(0.12–0.95)

0.004

0.52(0.06–0.46)

0.045

23

4.30%

PREPARE trial(NCT00544232)

M. Untch-2011

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

ddE-ddT-CMF vs

EC-T

IIB—IIIC

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

DFS

OS

363

18.70%

1.14(0.85–1.52)

0.37

1.26(0.86–1.85)

0.237

370

13.20%

NeoSTOP(NCT02413320)

Priyanka Sharma-2021

Clin Cancer Res

Open-label

RCT

2

CbP-AC vs CbD

I—III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

OS

48

54.00%

EFS → DFS

2.85(0.34–23.60)

 > 0.05

1.83(0.28–11.76)

 > 0.05

52

54.00%

NeoCART

(NCT03154749)

Liulu Zhang-2021

Int J Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

DCb vs EC-D

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR EFS

OS

44

61.40%

EFS → DFS

0.76(0.2–2.84)

0.683

0.96(0.19–4.76)

0.959

44

38.60%

(UMIN000003355)

Madoka Iwase-2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Open-label

RCT

2

CbP-CEF vs P-CEF

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

DFS

OS

pCR

37

61.20%

0.22(0.06–0.82)

0.015

0.12(0.01–0.96)

0.046

38

26.30%

GeparOcto

(NCT02125344)

Andreas Schneeweiss-2022

European Journal of Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

PMCb vs iddEPC

II

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

iDFS

OS

203

48.00%

0.73(0.47–1.13)

0.1562

0.66(0.38–1.15)

0.1442

200

48.30%

WSG-ADAPT-TN (NCT01815242)

Oleg Gluz-2022

European Journal of Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

nab-pac + Cb vs

nab-pac + G

I-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

i/dDFS

OS

182

44.00%

1.21(0.76–1.94)

0.424

1.06(0.63–1.78)

0.836

154

28.00%

GeparSixto

(NCT01426880)

Eric Hahnen-2017

JAMA Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

PMBevCb vs PMBev

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

158

53.20%

0.53(0.29–0.96)

0.04

NA

 

157

36.90%

(NCT01276769)

Pin Zhang-2016

Oncotarget

Open-label

RCT

2

pac + Cb vs pacE

II-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

RFS

OS

47

38.60%

(RFS → DFS)

0.35(0.13–0.96)

0.043

1.20(0.37–3.87)

0.350

44

14.00%

CALGB 40603

(NCT00861705)

William M.Sikov-2022

J Clin Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

pac + Cb + AC vs pac + AC

II-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

OS

221

54%

(EFS → DFS)

0.94(0.67–1.32)

0.7210

OS

1.12(0.77–1.61)

0.5585

212

41%

(ChiCTR-TRC-14005019)

Wenting Yan-2022

Ther Adv Med Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

TEL vs TE

I-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

tpCR

DFS

OS

99

41.40%

0.44(0.21–0.90)

0.028

0.44(0.18–1.02)

0.061

101

17.80%

Kun Wang

(SABCS)

Kun Wang-2022

SABCS

Open-label

RCT

2

wPCb-AC vs wP-AC

II

NA

DFS

OS

pCR

365

55.20%

0.79(0.61–1.02)

0.073

0.75(0.57–0.98)

0.034

355

41.50%

I-SPY2 Trial(NCT01042379)

Nanda, R-2020

JAMA Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

P + pac + AC vs PBO + pac + AC

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

29

60.00%

EFS → DFS

0.6(0.36–3.81)

 > 0.05

NA

NA

85

22.00%

168

41.1%

KEYNOTE-173 (NCT02622074)

P. Schmid-2020

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

6

P + Nab-pac + AC

vs P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs

P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs P + pac + Cb + AC

vs P + pac + Cb + AC

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

OS

10

60%

EFS → DFS

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

80%

10

80%

10

60%

10

30%

10

50%

KEYNOTE-522(NCT03036488)

P. Schmid-2020

New England Journal of Medicine

Open-label

RCT

2

P + pac + Cb + A/EC

vs pbo + pac + Cb + A/EC

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

784

64.80%

EFS → DFS

0.63(0.48–0.82)

P < 0.001

NA

 

390

51.20%

GeparNuevo (NCT02685059)

S. Loibl-2022

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

Dur + nab-pac

vs PBO + nab-pac

I-III

NA

pCR

iDFS

DDFS

OS

88

NA

DDFS → DFS 0.31(0.13–0.74)

0.005

0.24(0.08–0.72)

0.006

86

NA

BrighTNess (NCT02032277)

Sibylle Loibl-2022

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

3

Paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib

vs

Paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib placebo

vs

Paclitaxel + carboplatin placebo

 + veliparib placebo

I-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0 or 1 +)

pCR

EFS

OS

breast-conservation surgery

316

53.00%

EFS → DFS

1.12(0.72–1.72)

(1 vs 2)

0.56(0.34–0.93)

(2 vs 3)

0.62(1 vs 2)

0.02(2 vs 3)

1.25 (0.70–2.24)

(1 vs 2)

0.63 (0.33–1.21)

(2 vs 3)

0.46

(1 vs 2)

0.17

(2 vs 3)

160

58.00%

158

31.00%

NSABP-B40(NCT00408408)

Harry D Bear-2015

Lancet Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + 

vs

Non-Bev

I-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

592

51.10%

0.8 (0.63–1.01)

0.06

0.65(0.49–0.88)

0.004

594

47.10%

GeparQuinto(NCT00567554)

G. von Minckwitz-2014

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

ECB-DB

vs

EC-D

II-III

ER (< 10%)

PR (< 10%)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

OS

323

39.30%

1.03(0.84–1.25)

0.784

0.97(0.75–1.26)

0.842

340

27.90%

SWOG S0800(NCT00856492)

Z. A. Nahleh-2016

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + nab-pac + ddAC

vs Non-Bev-based

IIB—IIIC

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

DFS

OS

98

59.40%

EFS → DFS

0.46(0.2–1.05)

0.06

0.49(0.19–1.29)

0.14

113

28.60%

ARTemis(NCT01093235)

H. M. Earl-2017

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + D-FEC

vs

D-FEC

NA

(ER) status as negative when Allred score was 0–2/8; ER weakly positive was 3–5/8; and ER strongly positive was 6–8/8

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

OS

388

22.00%

1.18(0.89–1.57)

0.25

1.26(0.9–1.76)

0.19

393

17.00%

Study ID

Auther-year

Journal

Masking

RCT

Arms

Medicine

Clinical stage

TNBC definition

Endpoints

Total numbers

pCR (%)

HR for DFS

P value

HR for OS

P value

NATT trial

Xiaosong Chen-2013

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Open-label

RCT

2

TAC vs TC

IIB—IIIC

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

DFS

OS

26

15.40%

DFS

0.33(0.12–0.95)

0.004

0.52(0.06–0.46)

0.045

23

4.30%

PREPARE trial(NCT00544232)

M. Untch-2011

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

ddE-ddT-CMF vs

EC-T

IIB—IIIC

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

DFS

OS

363

18.70%

1.14(0.85–1.52)

0.37

1.26(0.86–1.85)

0.237

370

13.20%

NeoSTOP(NCT02413320)

Priyanka Sharma-2021

Clin Cancer Res

Open-label

RCT

2

CbP-AC vs CbD

I—III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

OS

48

54.00%

EFS → DFS

2.85(0.34–23.60)

 > 0.05

1.83(0.28–11.76)

 > 0.05

52

54.00%

NeoCART

(NCT03154749)

Liulu Zhang-2021

Int J Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

DCb vs EC-D

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR EFS

OS

44

61.40%

EFS → DFS

0.76(0.2–2.84)

0.683

0.96(0.19–4.76)

0.959

44

38.60%

(UMIN000003355)

Madoka Iwase-2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Open-label

RCT

2

CbP-CEF vs P-CEF

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

DFS

OS

pCR

37

61.20%

0.22(0.06–0.82)

0.015

0.12(0.01–0.96)

0.046

38

26.30%

GeparOcto

(NCT02125344)

Andreas Schneeweiss-2022

European Journal of Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

PMCb vs iddEPC

II

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

iDFS

OS

203

48.00%

0.73(0.47–1.13)

0.1562

0.66(0.38–1.15)

0.1442

200

48.30%

WSG-ADAPT-TN (NCT01815242)

Oleg Gluz-2022

European Journal of Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

nab-pac + Cb vs

nab-pac + G

I-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

i/dDFS

OS

182

44.00%

1.21(0.76–1.94)

0.424

1.06(0.63–1.78)

0.836

154

28.00%

GeparSixto

(NCT01426880)

Eric Hahnen-2017

JAMA Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

PMBevCb vs PMBev

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

158

53.20%

0.53(0.29–0.96)

0.04

NA

 

157

36.90%

(NCT01276769)

Pin Zhang-2016

Oncotarget

Open-label

RCT

2

pac + Cb vs pacE

II-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

RFS

OS

47

38.60%

(RFS → DFS)

0.35(0.13–0.96)

0.043

1.20(0.37–3.87)

0.350

44

14.00%

CALGB 40603

(NCT00861705)

William M.Sikov-2022

J Clin Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

pac + Cb + AC vs pac + AC

II-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

OS

221

54%

(EFS → DFS)

0.94(0.67–1.32)

0.7210

OS

1.12(0.77–1.61)

0.5585

212

41%

(ChiCTR-TRC-14005019)

Wenting Yan-2022

Ther Adv Med Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

TEL vs TE

I-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

tpCR

DFS

OS

99

41.40%

0.44(0.21–0.90)

0.028

0.44(0.18–1.02)

0.061

101

17.80%

Kun Wang

(SABCS)

Kun Wang-2022

SABCS

Open-label

RCT

2

wPCb-AC vs wP-AC

II

NA

DFS

OS

pCR

365

55.20%

0.79(0.61–1.02)

0.073

0.75(0.57–0.98)

0.034

355

41.50%

I-SPY2 Trial(NCT01042379)

Nanda, R-2020

JAMA Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

P + pac + AC vs PBO + pac + AC

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

29

60.00%

EFS → DFS

0.6(0.36–3.81)

 > 0.05

NA

NA

85

22.00%

168

41.1%

KEYNOTE-173 (NCT02622074)

P. Schmid-2020

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

6

P + Nab-pac + AC

vs P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs

P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs P + pac + Cb + AC

vs P + pac + Cb + AC

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

OS

10

60%

EFS → DFS

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

80%

10

80%

10

60%

10

30%

10

50%

KEYNOTE-522(NCT03036488)

P. Schmid-2020

New England Journal of Medicine

Open-label

RCT

2

P + pac + Cb + A/EC

vs pbo + pac + Cb + A/EC

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

784

64.80%

EFS → DFS

0.63(0.48–0.82)

P < 0.001

NA

 

390

51.20%

GeparNuevo (NCT02685059)

S. Loibl-2022

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

Dur + nab-pac

vs PBO + nab-pac

I-III

NA

pCR

iDFS

DDFS

OS

88

NA

DDFS → DFS 0.31(0.13–0.74)

0.005

0.24(0.08–0.72)

0.006

86

NA

BrighTNess (NCT02032277)

Sibylle Loibl-2022

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

3

Paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib

vs

Paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib placebo

vs

Paclitaxel + carboplatin placebo

 + veliparib placebo

I-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0 or 1 +)

pCR

EFS

OS

breast-conservation surgery

316

53.00%

EFS → DFS

1.12(0.72–1.72)

(1 vs 2)

0.56(0.34–0.93)

(2 vs 3)

0.62(1 vs 2)

0.02(2 vs 3)

1.25 (0.70–2.24)

(1 vs 2)

0.63 (0.33–1.21)

(2 vs 3)

0.46

(1 vs 2)

0.17

(2 vs 3)

160

58.00%

158

31.00%

NSABP-B40(NCT00408408)

Harry D Bear-2015

Lancet Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + 

vs

Non-Bev

I-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

592

51.10%

0.8 (0.63–1.01)

0.06

0.65(0.49–0.88)

0.004

594

47.10%

GeparQuinto(NCT00567554)

G. von Minckwitz-2014

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

ECB-DB

vs

EC-D

II-III

ER (< 10%)

PR (< 10%)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

OS

323

39.30%

1.03(0.84–1.25)

0.784

0.97(0.75–1.26)

0.842

340

27.90%

SWOG S0800(NCT00856492)

Z. A. Nahleh-2016

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + nab-pac + ddAC

vs Non-Bev-based

IIB—IIIC

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

DFS

OS

98

59.40%

EFS → DFS

0.46(0.2–1.05)

0.06

0.49(0.19–1.29)

0.14

113

28.60%

ARTemis(NCT01093235)

H. M. Earl-2017

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + D-FEC

vs

D-FEC

NA

(ER) status as negative when Allred score was 0–2/8; ER weakly positive was 3–5/8; and ER strongly positive was 6–8/8

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

OS

388

22.00%

1.18(0.89–1.57)

0.25

1.26(0.9–1.76)

0.19

393

17.00%

Study ID

Auther-year

Journal

Masking

RCT

Arms

Medicine

Clinical stage

TNBC definition

Endpoints

Total numbers

pCR (%)

HR for DFS

P value

HR for OS

P value

NATT trial

Xiaosong Chen-2013

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Open-label

RCT

2

TAC vs TC

IIB—IIIC

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

DFS

OS

26

15.40%

DFS

0.33(0.12–0.95)

0.004

0.52(0.06–0.46)

0.045

23

4.30%

PREPARE trial(NCT00544232)

M. Untch-2011

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

ddE-ddT-CMF vs

EC-T

IIB—IIIC

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

DFS

OS

363

18.70%

1.14(0.85–1.52)

0.37

1.26(0.86–1.85)

0.237

370

13.20%

NeoSTOP(NCT02413320)

Priyanka Sharma-2021

Clin Cancer Res

Open-label

RCT

2

CbP-AC vs CbD

I—III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

OS

48

54.00%

EFS → DFS

2.85(0.34–23.60)

 > 0.05

1.83(0.28–11.76)

 > 0.05

52

54.00%

NeoCART

(NCT03154749)

Liulu Zhang-2021

Int J Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

DCb vs EC-D

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR EFS

OS

44

61.40%

EFS → DFS

0.76(0.2–2.84)

0.683

0.96(0.19–4.76)

0.959

44

38.60%

(UMIN000003355)

Madoka Iwase-2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Open-label

RCT

2

CbP-CEF vs P-CEF

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

DFS

OS

pCR

37

61.20%

0.22(0.06–0.82)

0.015

0.12(0.01–0.96)

0.046

38

26.30%

GeparOcto

(NCT02125344)

Andreas Schneeweiss-2022

European Journal of Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

PMCb vs iddEPC

II

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

iDFS

OS

203

48.00%

0.73(0.47–1.13)

0.1562

0.66(0.38–1.15)

0.1442

200

48.30%

WSG-ADAPT-TN (NCT01815242)

Oleg Gluz-2022

European Journal of Cancer

Open-label

RCT

2

nab-pac + Cb vs

nab-pac + G

I-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

i/dDFS

OS

182

44.00%

1.21(0.76–1.94)

0.424

1.06(0.63–1.78)

0.836

154

28.00%

GeparSixto

(NCT01426880)

Eric Hahnen-2017

JAMA Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

PMBevCb vs PMBev

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

158

53.20%

0.53(0.29–0.96)

0.04

NA

 

157

36.90%

(NCT01276769)

Pin Zhang-2016

Oncotarget

Open-label

RCT

2

pac + Cb vs pacE

II-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

RFS

OS

47

38.60%

(RFS → DFS)

0.35(0.13–0.96)

0.043

1.20(0.37–3.87)

0.350

44

14.00%

CALGB 40603

(NCT00861705)

William M.Sikov-2022

J Clin Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

pac + Cb + AC vs pac + AC

II-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

OS

221

54%

(EFS → DFS)

0.94(0.67–1.32)

0.7210

OS

1.12(0.77–1.61)

0.5585

212

41%

(ChiCTR-TRC-14005019)

Wenting Yan-2022

Ther Adv Med Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

TEL vs TE

I-III

ER < 10%

PR < 10%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

tpCR

DFS

OS

99

41.40%

0.44(0.21–0.90)

0.028

0.44(0.18–1.02)

0.061

101

17.80%

Kun Wang

(SABCS)

Kun Wang-2022

SABCS

Open-label

RCT

2

wPCb-AC vs wP-AC

II

NA

DFS

OS

pCR

365

55.20%

0.79(0.61–1.02)

0.073

0.75(0.57–0.98)

0.034

355

41.50%

I-SPY2 Trial(NCT01042379)

Nanda, R-2020

JAMA Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

P + pac + AC vs PBO + pac + AC

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

29

60.00%

EFS → DFS

0.6(0.36–3.81)

 > 0.05

NA

NA

85

22.00%

168

41.1%

KEYNOTE-173(NCT02622074)

P. Schmid-2020

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

6

P + Nab-pac + AC

vs P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs

P + Nab-pac + Cb + AC vs P + pac + Cb + AC

vs P + pac + Cb + AC

II-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

OS

10

60%

EFS → DFS

NA

NA

NA

NA

10

80%

10

80%

10

60%

10

30%

10

50%

KEYNOTE-522(NCT03036488)

P. Schmid-2020

New England Journal of Medicine

Open-label

RCT

2

P + pac + Cb + A/EC

vs pbo + pac + Cb + A/EC

II-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

EFS

784

64.80%

EFS → DFS

0.63(0.48–0.82)

P < 0.001

NA

 

390

51.20%

GeparNuevo (NCT02685059)

S. Loibl-2022

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

Dur + nab-pac

vs PBO + nab-pac

I-III

NA

pCR

iDFS

DDFS

OS

88

NA

DDFS → DFS 0.31(0.13–0.74)

0.005

0.24(0.08–0.72)

0.006

86

NA

BrighTNess(NCT02032277)

Sibylle Loibl-2022

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

3

Paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib

vs

Paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib placebo

vs

Paclitaxel + carboplatin placebo

 + veliparib placebo

I-III

ER < 1%

PR < 1%

Her2(0 or 1 +)

pCR

EFS

OS

breast-conservation surgery

316

53.00%

EFS → DFS

1.12(0.72–1.72)

(1 vs 2)

0.56(0.34–0.93)

(2 vs 3)

0.62(1 vs 2)

0.02(2 vs 3)

1.25 (0.70–2.24)

(1 vs 2)

0.63 (0.33–1.21)

(2 vs 3)

0.46

(1 vs 2)

0.17

(2 vs 3)

160

58.00%

158

31.00%

NSABP-B40(NCT00408408)

Harry D Bear-2015

Lancet Oncol

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + 

vs

Non-Bev

I-III

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

EFS

592

51.10%

0.8(0.63–1.01)

0.06

0.65(0.49–0.88)

0.004

594

47.10%

GeparQuinto(NCT00567554)

G. von Minckwitz-2014

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

ECB-DB

vs

EC-D

II-III

ER (< 10%)

PR (< 10%)

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

OS

323

39.30%

1.03(0.84–1.25)

0.784

0.97(0.75–1.26)

0.842

340

27.90%

SWOG S0800(NCT00856492)

Z. A. Nahleh-2016

Breast Cancer Res Treat

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + nab-pac + ddAC

vs Non-Bev-based

IIB—IIIC

ER(-)

PR(-)

Her2(-)

pCR

DFS

OS

98

59.40%

EFS → DFS

0.46(0.2–1.05)

0.06

0.49(0.19–1.29)

0.14

113

28.60%

ARTemis(NCT01093235)

H. M. Earl-2017

Annals of Oncology

Open-label

RCT

2

Bev + D-FEC

vs

D-FEC

NA

(ER) status as negative when Allred score was 0–2/8; ER weakly positive was 3–5/8; and ER strongly positive was 6–8/8

Her2(0–2 + FISH-)

pCR

DFS

OS

388

22.00%

1.18(0.89–1.57)

0.25

1.26(0.9–1.76)

0.19

393

17.00%