Skip to main content

Table 2 The basic information of the included studies

From: Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography in staging gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

PL (C/E)

Design(R/P)

Blind

Number

Gender(F/M)

Average age ±SD (years)

TNM edition

Agents

Machine

Scheme(D/O)

≤T1 VS ≥T2

TP

FP

FN

TN

Cheng-long Wang

2009

China

C

R

DB

59

24/38

56.0 ± 11.4

UICC 6th

Contrast medium

Acuson Sequoia 512

O

2

1

1

55

D

2

0

1

56

Jian Cui

2010

China

C

R

DB

59

N

N

UICC 6th

water

Acuson Sequoia 512

O

2

15

1

41

D

2

6

1

50

Kengo Satoa

2017

Japan

E

R

DB

N

N

N

The Japanese versionc

Water

APLIO XG/SSA-790A, APLIO 500 TUS一A500

O

89

13

11

79

Shuxiang Zhang

2018

China

E

R

DB

72

27/45

46.9±11.3

UICC 8th

Contrast medium

GE Voluson730

O

14

2

6

50

Ping He

2019

China

E

R

DB

54

18/36

61±9.70

AJCC 8th

water

Philips iU22

D

7

0

1

46

Q.Z. Gai

2021

China

E

R

DB

109

41/68

51.37±11.45

AJCC 8th

Contrast medium

Philips iU22

O

20

2

5

82

Zhixiang Gao

2022

China

E

R

DB

46

N

N

N

Water

Philips iU22

O

3

3

0

40

LING-LING Wu

2023

China

E

P

DB

108

29/79

61.7±11.2

AJCC 8th

Contrast medium

GE LOGIQ E9

O

16

3

3

86

Liang Wang

2019

China

E

R

DB

158

52/106

59.5±10.6

N

Contrast medium

Acuson Sequoia 512

D

20

3

12

123

Junling Wang

2021

China

E

R

DB

206

95/111

59.7±11.3

AJCC 8th

Contrast medium

Acuson Sequoia 512

D

10

3

1

192

Tao Yu

2015

China

E

R

DB

40

13/27

49(25~73)b

AJCC 7th

Contrast medium

GE Logiq E9

O

5

1

0

34

Zhijun Liu

2015

China

E

P

DB

264

N

N

N

Contrast medium

Toshiba Aplio 400

O

32

4

4

224

Sheng-Ri Liao

2004

China

E

R

DB

125

47/78

N

AJCC 6th

Water

Toshiba 6000, Aloka 2000, DU-6

O

5

2

4

114

Sainan Wang

2022

China

E

R

DB

50

28/22

25.5±25

N

Contrast medium

MINDRAY Resona 7T

O

8

0

4

38

  1. aThis study included 190 patients with a total of 200 lesions, of which 8 lesions were unclear
  2. bMedian age (range)
  3. cThe TNM criteria of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma
  4. PL publication language, SD Standard deviation, C Chinese, E English, P Prospective study, R Retrospective study, DB Double blind design, N Not unclear, TP True positive, FP False positive, FN False negative, TN True negative, UICC Union for International Cancer Control, AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer, D Double contrast enhanced gastric ultrasonograp, O Oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography