Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies included

From: Systematic review: brain metastases from colorectal cancer—Incidence and patient characteristics

Studies

Years

Country

No. CRC patients

Inci-dence

CI 95 %

Conse-cutive

Type of studya

Inclusion criteria for patients with CRC used in the studies.

Noura et al. [7]

1985–2006

Japan

2299

1.3 %

(0.8–1.8 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Suzuki et al. [8]

1979–2010

Japan

5345

2.6 %

(2.2–3.1 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Hugen et al.b [9]

1991–2010

Netherlands

5817

0.9 %

(0.7–1.2 %)

NO

Autopsy

Diagnosed CRC

Tan et al. [10]

1995–2003

Singapore

4378

0.6 %

(0.4–0.9 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Mongan et al. [11]

1984–2006

USA

1620

2.3 %

(1.7–3.3 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Jung M et al. [12]

1995–2008

Korea

8732

1.5 %

(1.2–1.7 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Pramateftakis et al. [13]

1990–2009

Greece

670

0.7 %

(0.2–1.7 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Jiang et al. [14]

1991–2010

China

8220

0.7 %

(0.6–0.9 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Tevlin et al. [15]

1988–2012

Ireland

4219

0.3 %

(0.1–0.5 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Tanriverdi et al. [16]

2001–2012

Turkey

4864

2.7 %

(2.3–3.2 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Temple et al. [17]

1959–1979

USA

999

2.9 %

(2.0–4.1 %)

YES

Autopsy

Diagnosed CRC

Naito et al. [18]

1967–1992

Japan

778

1.9 %

(1.1–3.2 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Hammoud et al. [19]

1980–1994

USA

8632

1.7 %

(1.5–2.0 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Ko et al. [20]

1970–1996

Taiwan

7153

0.7 %

(0.6–1.0 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Zorrilla et al. [21]

1996–2000

Spain

378

2.4 %

(1.1–4.5 %)

YES

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Schouten et al. [22]

1986–1998

Netherlands

720

1.4 %.

(0.7–2.5 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRC

Barnholtz-Sloan et al. [23]

1973–2001

USA

42,817

1.8 %

(1.7–2.0 %)

YES

Register

Diagnosed CRC

Kim et al. [24]

1987–2009

Korea

4350

1.1 %

(0.8–1.4 %)

-

Clinical

Diagnosed CRCd

Sundermeyer et al. [25]

1993–2002

USA

1020

3.2 %

(2.2–4.5 %)

-

Clinical

mCRC

Yeager et al. [26]

2008–2012

USA

918

4.0 %

(2.9–5.5 %)

-

Clinical

mCRC

Chyun et al. [27]

1977–1989

USA

78

23.0 %

(14.3–34.0 %)

YES

Clinical

mCRC

Patanaphan et al. [28]

1979–1982

USA

163

3.0 %

(0.7–6.2 %)

YES

Clinical

mCRC

Tran et al. [29]

1996–2009

Australia and USA

524

5.15 %

(3.4–7.4 %)

-

Clinical

mCRC

Hess et al. [30]

1994–1997

USA

984

0.7 %c

(0.3–1.5 %)

-

Clinical

mCRC

Tie et al. [31]

1999–2009

Australia

46

-

 

-

Clinical

mCRC

Khattak et al. [32]

2006–2011

Australia

2006

-e

 

NO

Clinical

mCRCe.

Kemeny et al. [33]

2003–2013

USA

169

5.0 %

(2.5–9.9 %)

NO

Clinical

Liver metastasectomy + chemotherapy

Yoshidome et al. [34]

1985–2001

Japan

207

4.0 %

(1.7–7.5 %)

YES

Clinical

Liver metastasectomy

de Jong et al. [35]

1982–2008

USA

1669

1.3 %

(0.8–2.0 %)

-

Clinical

Liver metastasectomy

Byrne et al. [36]

1987–2009

UK

1304

4.0 %

(3.0–5.2 %)

YES

Clinical

Liver metastasectomy

Higashiyama et al. [37]

1981–2001

Japan

100

13.0 %

(7.1–21.2 %)

YES

Clinical

Pulmonary metastasectomy

Hugen et al.b [9]

1996–1999

Netherlands

1530

1.1 %

(0.6–1.8 %)

-

Clinical

Rectal cancer

Chiang et al. [38]

2002–2006

Taiwan

884

-f

 

YES

Clinical

Rectal cancer with T3 and T4 who had not received neoadjuvant therapy

Weiss et al. [39]

1944–1984

Multiple

1541

2.5 %

(1.8–3.4 %)

-

Autopsy

Colon cancer

Cascino et al. [40]

1977–1980

USA

1006

4.0 %

(2.9–5.4 %)

YES

Clinical

Colon cancer

Takagawa et al. [41]

1992–2003

Japan

638

1.3 %

(0.5–2.5 %)

YES

Clinical

Verified radical resected stages 1–3 tumor

van Gestel et al. [42]

2003–2008

Netherlands

5671

1.11 %

(0.9–1.4 %)

Yes

Register

Intended curatively treated primary cancer stages 1–3.

Tokoro et al. [43]

1998–2010

Japan

1364

1.8 %

(1.2–2.7 %)

YES

Clinical

Surgically treated for primary cancer and/or metastases

Scartozzi et al. [44]

1995–2005

Italy

99

-

 

-

Clinical

Both primary and metastases removed

Damiens et al. [4]

2000–2009

Canada

48

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM

Kruser et al. [45]

1994–2005

USA

49

-

 

-

Clinical

BM

Smedby et al. [46]

1987–2006

Sweden

1001

-

 

YES

Register

BM

Fokas et al. [47]

1996–2007

Germany

78

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM

Magni et al. [48]

2003–2013

Italy

41

-

 

Yes

Clinical

BM

Farnell et al. [49]

1976–1993

USA

150

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM

Kye et al. [50]

1997–2006

Korea

39

-

 

-

Clinical

BM and survived more than a month after BM diagnosis

Beak et al. [51]

2001–2009

Korea

118

-

 

-

Clinical

BM treated with WBRT, SRS, or surgery

Nieder et al. [52]

1983–2008

Norway

35

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM treated with WBRT

Bartelt et al. [53]

1985–2000

Germany

47

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM treated with WBRT

Heisterkamp et al. [54]

1989–2008

Germany

53

-

 

-

Clinical

BM treated with WBRT

Matsunaga et al. [55]

1992–2008

Japan

152

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM less than 3 cm and treated with SRS

Schoeggl et al. [56]

1993–1996

Austria

35

-

 

-

Clinical

BM treated with SRS

Wronski et al. [57]

1974–1993

USA

73

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM treated neurosurgically

Fowler et al. [58]

1999–2007

Australia

32

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM treated neurosurgically

Maglio et al. [59]

1999–2013

Italy

53

-

 

Yes

Clinical

BM treated neurosurgically

Mege et al. [60]

1998–2009

France

28

-

 

YES

Clinical

BM treated neurosurgically

Taher et al. [61]

1990–2009

Sweden

37

-

 

-

Clinical

BM treated neurosurgically

D’Andrea et al. [62]

1960–2000

Italy

44

-

 

-

Clinical

Single BM neurosurgically treated

Simonova et al. [63]

1992–1998

Czech republic

30

-

 

-

Clinical

Single BM radiosurgically treated

Onodera et al. [64]

1979–1998

Japan

1077

-

 

-

Clinical

Criteria unknown

  1. Abbreviations: CRC Colorectal cancer, mCRC metastatic colorectal cancer, BM Brain metastases, WRBT Whole brain radiation therapy, SRS Stereotactic radiosurgery. Dash(−) means not reported
  2. aType of study: 1) Autopsy – studies where the patients were diagnosed based on autopsy 2) Clinic– studies where diagnosis are made radiological and authors had access to patient history, surgery reports and so on. 3) Register – studies with information from register and where authors did not have access to patient history or surgery reports
  3. bThe study by Hugen et al. contained information from two different cohorts. One cohort of patients with primary CRC in which diagnosis was based on autopsies, and a study based on radiological diagnosis that only included rectal cancer patients
  4. cHess et al. did only follow-up on patients once for the study, 4 months after referral to the hospital, which could result in lower incidence
  5. dKim et al. did not report characteristics of all 47 BM patients but only in 38 patients who received SRS treatment for BM
  6. eKhattak et al. only report incidence of BM as only metastatic site of 0.4 %
  7. fChiang et al. did not report incidence from the entire cohort but only selected groups, e.g. patients with lung metastases