Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Vanna Chiarion Sileni |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Middleton |
23 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claus Garbe |
28 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sanjiv Agarwala |
9 Dec 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Kirkwood |
23 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Vanna Chiarion Sileni |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
23 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Kirkwood |
4 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claus Garbe |
23 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sanjiv Agarwala |
27 Jan 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vanna Chiarion Sileni |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Jan 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
8 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Vanna Chiarion Sileni |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
8 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
27 Feb 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Feb 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-6-44 |
You can find further information about peer review here.