Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the studies in the meta-analysis

From: Prognostic significance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Study (Reference)

Year

Country

Treatment

Sample size(Male, n)

Mean/median Ages(years)

Tumor vascular invasion (yes)

NLR (cut-off used;n)

Halazun[38]

2009

USA

LT

150(119)

57.1

45

5

Motomura[30]

2013

Japan

LT

158(92)

57

59

4

Bertuzzo[36]

2011

Italy

LT

219(186)

57

124

5

Limaye[27]

2013

USA

LT

160(130)

55.5/55.1

25

5

Wang[34]

2011

China

LT

101(92)

48.4

30

3

Gomez[39]

2008

UK

SR

96(72)

65

49

5

Mano[24]

2013

Japan

SR

958(689)

67

NA

2.81

McNally[29]

2013

USA

TACE

103(77)

56

NA

5

Huang[37]

2011

China

TACE

145(134)

49

39

3.3

Pinato1[33]

2012

UK

TACE

54(40)

63

NA

5

Chen[35]

2011

Taiwan

RF

192(95)

65.7

NA

2.4

Dan[25]

2013

China

RF

178(159)

57

NA

1.9

Oh[26]

2013

Korea

Mix

318((240)

58

107

2.3

Pinato2[32]

2012

UK

Mix

112(90)

65

NA

5

Kinoshita[31]

2012

Japan

Mix

150(106)

72

NA

5

Study

Sampling time

Follow-up Mean/median (months)

Outcome measured

Multivariate analysis

Patients with elevated NLR

Study quality (Points)

Halazun[38]

Pre-LT

37.2

DFS/ OS

yes

13

8/9

Motomura[30]

Pre-LT

40.3

DFS/OS

yes

26

8/9

Bertuzzo[36]

Pre-LT

40

DFS/ OS

yes

23

5/9

Limaye[27]

Pre-LT

38

DFS/ OS

yes

28

8/9

Wang[34]

Pre-LT

34.2

DFS/ OS

yes

33

7/9

Gomez[39]

Pre-SR

30

DFS/ OS

yes

26

6/9

Mano[24]

Pre-SR

NA

DFS/ OS

yes

238

5/9

McNally[29]

Pre-TACE

11.1

OS

no

18

7/9

Huang[37]

Pre- TACE

10

OS

yes

59

8/9

Pinato1[33]

Pre-TACE

NA

OS

Yes

9

5/9

Chen[35]

Pre-RFA

34

OS/DFS

yes

81

7/9

Dan[25]

Pre-RFA

52.7

OS/DFS

yes

91

7/9

Oh[26]

Pre-treatment

13.9

OS

yes

189

7/9

Pinato2[32]

Pre-treatment

10

OS

yes

25

7/9

Kinoshita[31]

Pre-treatment

18

0S

no

15

6/9

  1. M, male; F, female; NA, not available.
  2. Treatment describes whether the patients received surgical resection (SR), or liver transplantation (LT) of HCC, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation(RFA), mixed treatment (Mix) including locoregional ,systemic treatments or supportive care.
  3. Tumor vascular invasion was defined as presence of either macro- or microscopic vascular invasion (including portal vein invasion, etc.).
  4. OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival.
  5. Study quality is listed using the results of the Newcastle –Ottawa questionnaire.