Skip to main content

Table 1 Antitumor effectiveness of single mIL-12 gene electrotransfer alone or combined with irradiation on SA-1 sarcoma

From: Radiosensitizing effect of intratumoral interleukin-12 gene electrotransfer in murine sarcoma

Therapeutic group

N

DT (days; AM ± SE)*

GD (days; AM ± SE)**

Cures†(%; n)

SC resistance#

Control

12

1.7 ± 0.2

-

0

 

EP

13

4.2 ± 0.6

2.5 ± 0.6

0

 

dsRed

12

3.1 ± 0.3

1.3 ± 0.3

0

 

EGT dsRed

14

5.3 ± 0.9

3.5 ± 0.9

0

 

mIL-12

13

3.1 ± 0.4

1.4 ± 0.4

0

 

EGT mIL12

14

20.0 ± 3.0 ‡

18.3 ± 3.0

7.1 (1/14)

0/1

IR

13

5.4 ± 0.9

3.7 ± 0.9

0

 

EP + IR

14

14.4 ± 4.2 ‡

12.7 ± 4.2

0

 

dsRed + IR

9

5.3 ± 1.1

3.6 ± 1.1

0

 

EGT dsRed + IR

11

9.3 ± 1.9

7.5 ± 1.9

0

 

mIL-12 + IR

13

10.7 ± 1.7

8.9 ± 1.7

0

 

EGT mIL-12 + IR

14

32.6 ± 4.3 ‡§

30.9 ± 4.3 §

21.4 (3/14)

1/3

  1. Therapeutic groups: 10 Gy single dose irradiation (IR), electrical pulse application alone (EP) or combined with irradiation (EP + IR), intratumoral injection of plasmid DNA coding for mIL-12 or dsRed alone (mIL-12, dsRed) or combined with irradiation (mIL-12 + IR, dsRed + IR), mIL-12 or dsRed gene electrotransfer alone (EGT mIL-12, EGT dsRed) or combined with irradiation (EGT mIL-12 + IR, EGT dsRed + IR).
  2. N - Number of all mice in the group.
  3. * - Tumor doubling time - only mice with tumors were included in calculation.
  4. ** - Tumor growth delay - only mice with tumors were included in calculation.
  5. † - Cures were determined 100 days after the treatment.
  6. # - Resistance to secondary challenge – number of cured mice that were resistant to secondary challenge is shown.
  7. ‡
  8. - Statistical significant difference compared to control group (p < 0.05).
  9. § - Statistical significant difference compared to IR (p < 0.05).