Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean satisfaction, perceived understanding, knowledge and risk perception

From: Association between genomic recurrence risk and well-being among breast cancer patients

 

Satisfaction

Perceived understanding

Knowledge

Risk perception

 

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

C-low/G-low

2.02 (1.92-2.13)

2.91 (2.84-2.98)

0.77 (0.74-0.80)

22.38 (18.28-26.48)

C-high/G-high

2.08 (1.92-2.24)

2.94 (2.84-3.04)

0.78 (0.73-0.82)

31.60 (24.78-38.42)

C-low/G-high (ass. no CT)

2.23 (1.70-2.77)

2.65 (2.31-2.99)

0.73 (0.59-0.86)

35.91 (20.17-51.65)

C-low/G-high (ass. CT)

2.15 (1.82-2.49)

2.88 (2.65-3.12)

0.77 (0.70-0.84)

30.31 (17.91-42.71)

C-high/G-low ass. no CT

2.08 (1.78-2.38)

2.88 (2.69-3.08)

0.78 (0.75-0.79)

27.09 (15.43-38.74)

C-high/G-low (ass.CT)

1.97 (1.63-2.31)

2.94 (2.78-3.11)

0.76 (0.69-0.83)

22.05 (12.37-31.73)

Overall

2.06 (1.98-2.14)

2.90 (2.85-2.96)

0.77 (0.75-0.79)

26.50 (23.43-29.56)

p

0.831

0.353

0.952

0.115

  1. Note. n = 347. The reference group in analyses was C-low/G-low; p value is for omnibus test. C, clinical, G, genomic, ass. = randomly assigned to receive, CT, chemotherapy.
  2. Satisfaction scale: “very satisfied” (coded as 1), ”satisfied” (2), ”neutral” (3), ”unsatisfied” (4), ”very unsatisfied” (5).
  3. Perceived understanding scale : “not at all clear” (1), ”somewhat clear” (2), ”moderately clear” (3), ”completely clear” (4).
  4. Knowledge scale : percentage of correctly answered questions.
  5. Risk perception scale: “no risk of developing metastasis within 10 years” (0),“100% risk” (100).